Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

Hi Neil, Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2018, 12:10 + schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, 09:35 Matthias Bläsing, > wrote: > This sounds like something I would be interested in - is there > > indication, that Oracle wants to switch away from GPLv2-CP to > >

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

Well then, There are two major kind of snaps: Classic and Sandboxed Classic containers has full access to the OS stuff as of filesystems, networking, devices Sandboxed apps sees their own world. As the IDE has many plugins and many external tools Sandboxed mode is not suitable. That's why

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, 09:35 Matthias Bläsing, wrote: > Laszlo comment on this here: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/404#issuecomment-382096515 Yes, I'd seen that and your comment about bundled OpenJDK (which would equally apply to Oracle JDK).

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

Hi Neil, Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2018, 08:27 + schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, 07:05 Laszlo Kishalmi, > wrote: > > > Once we can provide our official signed versions the '--dangerous' > > flag > > would not be required. > > > > I've been reading this

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, 07:05 Laszlo Kishalmi, wrote: > Once we can provide our official signed versions the '--dangerous' flag > would not be required. > I've been reading this thread, but not looked at the actual snap yet. Does it bundle a JDK or rely on another snap?

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

Yes. It is my own build just being distributed as a file on an S3 bucket. Once we can provide our official signed versions the '--dangerous' flag would not be required. Snap help on dangerous: --dangerous    Install the given snap file even if there are no pre-acknowledged signatures

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

This being an unofficial package made by you Laszlo, correct? The '--dangerous' flag doesn't look reassuring. --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 19 April 2018 11:13 PM, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > The (undecided) 9.0 release candidate is available as snap: > >

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

The (undecided) 9.0 release candidate is available as snap: |wget https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/lkishalmi-us-west-2-public/snaps/netbeans_9.0-rc_amd64.snap sudo snap install netbeans_9.0-rc_amd64.snap --dangerous --classic| On 02/20/2018 05:08 AM, Neil C Smith wrote: On Tue, 20 Feb

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

Hi all, PR #404 is still open. Could somebody review that? On 02/18/2018 11:19 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: Any kind of native OS integration helps. I wouldn't want to depend on another service (like snapcraft.io). We have our own Jenkins instance on Apache. Can't we build the snaps ourselves?

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 at 12:47 constantin drabo wrote: > I think it will good . It will be an opportunity to bring back NetBeans to > Fedora Community after several years of mistrust . > +1 to providing the possibility of a Snap package, but I'm slightly intrigued what

RE: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

l'astronautique?? et de l'a??rospatiale modernes. De : Laszlo Kishalmi <laszlo.kisha...@gmail.com> Envoyé : dimanche 18 février 2018 18:49 À : dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org; geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com Objet : Snap Packaging of NetBeans Dear all, Ge

RE: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

l'astronautique?? et de l'a??rospatiale modernes. De : Laszlo Kishalmi <laszlo.kisha...@gmail.com> Envoyé : dimanche 18 février 2018 18:49 À : dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org; geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com Objet : Snap Packaging of NetBeans Dear all, Ge

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

See my reply in-line On 02/18/2018 11:19 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: Any kind of native OS integration helps. I wouldn't want to depend on another service (like snapcraft.io). We have our own Jenkins instance on Apache. Can't we build the snaps ourselves? Certainly we can. As of Daniel: If they

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

See my reply in-line On 02/18/2018 11:19 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: Any kind of native OS integration helps. I wouldn't want to depend on another service (like snapcraft.io). We have our own Jenkins instance on Apache. Can't we build the snaps ourselves? Certainly we can. As of Daniel: If they

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

Any kind of native OS integration helps. I wouldn't want to depend on another service (like snapcraft.io). We have our own Jenkins instance on Apache. Can't we build the snaps ourselves? We also have GitHub builds via Travis with dedicated Apache machines. Is it also impossible to build these

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

Well, at first, I'd utilize the Snapcraft.io build service, so if we need someone who can register a github hook on the repository on build.snapcraft.io. They are building the master branch (AFAIK), so the PR to the issue NETBEANS-341

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

Sure, make it happen! What kind of support or insights do you need for this? Gj On Monday, February 19, 2018, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > Dear all, Geertjan, > > I'm about to have NetBeans available as a Linux Distro agnostic Snap > package. > > I've tried to collect

Snap Packaging of NetBeans

Dear all, Geertjan, I'm about to have NetBeans available as a Linux Distro agnostic Snap package. I've tried to collect some information what and how it needs to be done. See: NETBEANS-341 I've got some info back