Re: Web site fixes/corrections

2015-07-22 Thread Dan Bress
If you are still working on this Aldrin, I noticed that Benson's name is spelled wrong on the people page [1] bimargulies Benson Margulie [1]http://nifi.apache.org/people.html Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Services From

Re: Write-Ahead-Log package name change?

2015-08-05 Thread Dan Bress
I'm fine with the package name being changed in 0.3.0 Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Services From: Mark Payne Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 3:01 PM To: dev@nifi.apache.org Subject: RE: Write-Ahead-Log package name change? Ryan, Th

Re: [DISCUSS] Feature proposal: Read-only mode as default

2015-08-10 Thread Dan Bress
a processor and hit configure I'd like to leave read-only mode and go into edit mode. I'm not sure I'd even want to be prompted with "do you want to enter edit mode?" here since I obviously do. Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Services __

Re: [DISCUSS] Removal of the 'master' vs 'develop' distinction

2015-08-13 Thread Dan Bress
+0. Our default branch is set to 'develop', so when you clone apache-nifi from git, you are automatically looking at the 'develop' branch, right? To me, this is a straight forward indicator of where I should be working. I thought we set this up a little while ago to avoid

Re: [DISCUSS] Removal of the 'master' vs 'develop' distinction

2015-08-13 Thread Dan Bress
Ah, I didn't realize that was a github only thing [1], I take-back my early comment and can now see how this is confusing. [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/nifi-dev/201501.mbox/%3CCALhtWke141nTsCdA4tHnZXOJ1UGhtZurLwvDsjBxH_G=86n...@mail.gmail.com%3E Dan Bress Software Engineer

Re: Lots o branches in git

2015-08-17 Thread Dan Bress
Joe, thanks for the heads up. I'll delete all of mine, as they are all resolved in JIRA NIFI-633: danbress NIFI-632: danbress NIFI-680: danbress NIFI-682: danbress NIFI-704: danbress NIFI-735: danbress Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Ser

Re: Process to create multiple files

2015-08-17 Thread Dan Bress
. I think it makes more sense to have one processor create one file, then you can use the flow to visually configure how many copies of the file you want to make. This should make this processor simpler and more reusable. Dan Bress Soft

Re: Lots o branches in git

2015-08-17 Thread Dan Bress
My stale branches have been deleted. Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Services From: Mike Drob Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 10:07 AM To: dev@nifi.apache.org Subject: Re: Lots o branches in git Also useful is git remote prune origin which

Help with new git repos

2015-08-19 Thread Dan Bress
tml [2] http://nifi.apache.org [3] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi-site.git;a=blob;f=README.md;h=2441a3011cb5163bd440fb04da41b18c8ac21a68;hb=HEAD Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Services

Re: Help with new git repos

2015-08-19 Thread Dan Bress
read, and if I get no negative feedback I'll email INFRA. Thanks, Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Services From: Joe Witt Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 11:49 AM To: dev@nifi.apache.org Cc: d...@nifi.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: H

Re: eliminate nifi-parent, split out nifi-nar-maven-plugin, have nifi in its own tree

2015-08-19 Thread Dan Bress
formatting the nifi-site/Readme.md which provides instructions for how to deploy the site. Does anyone object to me asking INFRA to provide github mirrors for nifi-site and nifi-maven? Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Services From: Joe Witt Sent:

Re: apache nifi oscon briefing

2015-08-21 Thread Dan Bress
+1 Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Services From: Corey Flowers Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 7:28 AM To: dev@nifi.apache.org Subject: Re: apache nifi oscon briefing +1 Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 21, 2015, at 6:53 AM, "e

Re: eliminate nifi-parent, split out nifi-nar-maven-plugin, have nifi in its own tree

2015-08-22 Thread Dan Bress
No feedback on this one in a few days. I will email INFRA now asking for the github mirrors. Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Services From: Dan Bress Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:33 PM To: dev@nifi.apache.org Subject: Re: eliminate

Re: How to delete docs for renamed processor

2015-09-09 Thread Dan Bress
Rick, Can you confirm whether the old processor name still shows up in the "new processor" UI when you try and drag a new processor on the graph? Also did you do a 'mvn clean install' on your nar, or just 'mvn install'? Dan Bress Software Eng

Re: How to delete docs for renamed processor

2015-09-09 Thread Dan Bress
Rick, It sounds like the nar contains both the old .class and the new .class Can you run "mvn clean install" on your nar, then look at the nar/META-INF/bundled-dependencies/your-processors.jar and see if it contains both the old class and the new class? Dan Bress Software Eng

Re: How to delete docs for renamed processor

2015-09-09 Thread Dan Bress
Rick, Great. Can you drop that in the lib directory(and make sure you don't have any other versions of this jar in that lib directory), stop nifi, delete the work directory, and restart? I think that will get you to where you want to be. Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Ser

Re: 1.0.0 Branch Guidance

2015-09-29 Thread Dan Bress
assumption to make? If not, I might be more inclined to agree with your original suggestion, although keeping that long living branch up to date with all the changes from master might be a maintenance nightmare. Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Services

Re: 1.0.0 Branch Guidance

2015-09-29 Thread Dan Bress
OK, sounds good to me. If I had to choose between keeping most of the communities work 'parked' as PullRequests and patches vs. merged into a 1.X branch that we keep up to date with master, I'd vote for 1.X branch. Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Cons

Re: Source code for Version 0.3.0

2015-10-02 Thread Dan Bress
I think a tag for each release signed by the person who originally released it would make the most sense to anyone looking at our codebase. Dan Bress Software Engineer ONYX Consulting Services From: Sean Busbey Sent: Friday, October 2, 2015 11:35 AM To

Fulfilling a pull request

2015-10-12 Thread dan bress
Apache NiFi Committers, I am working on fulfilling a pull request(NIFI-774), and wanted to make sure I am doing it right. These are the steps that I plan on following 1) git remote add yu https://github.com/yu-iskw/nifi.git 2) git pull yu 3) git checkout master 4) git merge --no

Re: Fulfilling a pull request

2015-10-12 Thread dan bress
Whoops, step 5 should be 5) mvn clean install -Pcontrib-check On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:00 AM dan bress wrote: > Apache NiFi Committers, >I am working on fulfilling a pull request(NIFI-774), and wanted to make > sure I am doing it right. > >These are the steps that I pl

"Integration" style Unit Tests

2015-10-12 Thread dan bress
Devs, While working on integrating and testing the work Yu did for NIFI-774/DeleteS3Object, I noticed that a few of the unit tests for the processors in that AWS bundle(Put and Fetch S3) actually interact with S3 directly, and were marked as @Ignore. If I wanted to un @Ignore them and actually

Re: Fulfilling a pull request

2015-10-12 Thread dan bress
[1] https://github.com/blog/967-github-secrets#diff-patch > [2] https://gist.github.com/piscisaureus/3342247 > [3] > > https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/#modifying-an-inactive-pull-request-locally > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:36 AM, dan bress wrote:

Re: "Integration" style Unit Tests

2015-10-14 Thread dan bress
gt; >> Dan, > >> > >> Yeah this is a good housekeeping item to bring up. My view here is > >> that B is the only answer. Unit tests should not be calling out to > >> external services - period. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Joe > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Ricky Saltzer

2015-10-21 Thread dan bress
Welcome Ricky! Thanks for your contributions and I look forward to you pushing Apache NiFi forward! On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:04 PM Tony Kurc wrote: > NiFi Community! > > Great news! > > On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Ricky > Saltzer has accepted the PMC's

Re: [DISCUSS] roadmap for the next 6-12 months

2016-01-08 Thread dan bress
Looks well thought out to me! Thanks to all who put the effort into this! On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:29 AM Joe Witt wrote: > Hello NiFi Community > > Please review the proposed roadmap and suggest things to add, remove, > update, prioritize differently. > > Over the past year we have had great co

Re: Component documentation improvements

2016-01-18 Thread dan bress
I just tossed some comments on the wikipage. TL;DR I took a look at generating docs as part of the build months ago. I think its doable, and someone should pursue it. On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:38 PM Joe Witt wrote: > Oleg, > > "Yes, there will be breaking changes. Its not a question of IF, but

Re: Javadoc

2016-01-19 Thread dan bress
I back putting NiFi Javadocs on the website, as it will provide a good place for new developers to learn how to extend NiFi. I believe we have a couple of Jira tickets asking for this [1] [2] Joe, mvn site can definitely do it, whether that is the 'best' way or not is debatable, since mvn site is

Re: Auto-Organize Layout

2016-01-19 Thread dan bress
Maybe not exactly "auto-layout" but I would back a notion of having the components snap to a coarser grain grid than what we currently have. Sometimes I care a lot about having everything line up in the graph horizontally and vertically, and it always takes a long time to achieve this. I could see

Re: Are we thinking about Penalization all wrong?

2016-01-28 Thread dan bress
Mark, I agree with all the points you mention about penalization being confusing, and I think the ability to apply a penalty to Flowfile's outside of a processor is a clearer way to express what is happening. I worry that having the penalty be a property of the connection would also be confu

Re: Re: Re: Processor additional documentation

2016-03-19 Thread dan bress
reate an index.html > file? Currently I have only created an additionalDetails.html file. > > I will also try to reduce the html code to a minimum and see if it is a > problem with my code. > > Bye, > > Uwe > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. März 2016 um 19:03 Uhr > > Von

Re: Re: Processor additional documentation

2016-03-19 Thread dan bress
Uwe, No its not a problem to have both index.html and additionalDetails.html The NiFi framework generates nearly all of the documentation for your processor for you. It will generate information about the properties and relationships your processor exposes to its users. If you need to express

Re: Your Distro

2016-03-23 Thread dan bress
Paul, Have you tried joining the mailing list using the instructions here: https://nifi.apache.org/mailing_lists.html I know in the past, we have had issues with people who aren't subscribed being unable to send to the list. This seems weird to me as well, but since you are bringing up som

Re: @DynamicProperty annotation of more than one property?

2016-04-19 Thread dan bress
Russell, I agree the syntax for multiple DynamicProperties is a little awkward, and that our documentation could be improved in this situation(I didn't see reference to @DynamicProperty in the developer doc). Also Java8 supports the concept of repeatable annotations[1], which would erase the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer James Wing

2016-05-11 Thread dan bress
Welcome James! On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:15 PM Mark Payne wrote: > Welcome, James! Glad to have you aboard! > > > On May 11, 2016, at 4:10 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > > > > On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that James > > Wing has accepted the PMC's inviation to become a comm

Re: [DISCUSS] - Markdown option for documentation artifacts

2016-06-08 Thread dan bress
+1 On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:05 AM Andre wrote: > +1 on this + a template that matches existing additional.html > On 8 Jun 2016 04:28, "Bryan Rosander" wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > When writing documentation (e.g. the additionalDetails.html for a > > processor) it would be nice to have the opti