NiFi Community,
On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Kevin Doran
has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC.
In addition to being a regular code contributor to the project for quite
some time, Kevin has been hard to miss on the mailing lists, especial
All,
On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Jeremy Dyer
has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC.
Jeremy has been a long-time contributor to the project - across many
different parts of the project to include NiFi and and MiNiFi, contributing
code, re
While likely not an issue with the release - I have a fresh install of
Ubuntu 18.04 I was verifying on and hit a heisenbug condition. TestPutUDP
was failing in weird fashion because as best as I can tell the default send
buffer size in the operating system was smaller than the default send
buffer o
+1 (binding)
ran through helper. ran some fairly simple tests.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 3:16 PM Kevin Doran wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Ran through the steps in the helper guide.
> Ran a test by Running NiFi, connecting with registry, and
> versioning/importing/running flows.
>
> Thanks for RM'ing
+1, sounds like a great idea
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing wrote:
> >
> > > +1, thanks fo
On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Nathan
has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi
project. We greatly appreciate all of Nathan's hard work and generous
contributions to the project. We look forward to his continued involvement
in
On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Ed has
accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi
project. We greatly appreciate all of Ed's hard work and generous
contributions to the project. We look forward to his continued involvement
in the proj
+1 (binding)
- Went through helper on ubuntu 16.04 (x86) without issue
- ran through some very simple flows
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:07 PM Andrew Lim
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> -Ran full clean install on OS X (10.14.2)
> -Ran a flow moving data from MySQL into Kudu (QueryDatabaseTable & up
+1 (binding)
went through helper with clean mvn repo, everything checks out and built
beautifully
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:27 PM Koji Kawamura
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Went through release helper guide.
> Thanks Joe for managing this release!
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 9:34 AM Aldrin Piri wro
+1 (binding)
ran through helper, no issues. built fine on my ubuntu box.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 12:11 PM Joe Witt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi
> nifi-1.9.2.
>
> The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
Congratulations Peter!!
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:21 AM Aldrin Piri wrote:
> NiFi Community,
>
> On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Peter Wicks
> has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC.
>
> Peter's contributions have been plentiful in code, co
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 12:29 AM Aldrin Piri wrote:
> +1, binding
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 19:46 Yolanda Davis
> wrote:
>
> > +1 Create NiFi Standard Libraries (binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:03 PM Koji Kawamura
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Create NiFi Standard Libraries (b
Apache NiFi community,
On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Rob
has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi
project. We greatly appreciate all of Rob's hard work and generous
contributions to the project. We look forward to his continue
On FBP purity - even absent this implementation, there are "global"
resources being contended over (disk, network, threads). Absent infinite
capacity in all those things, I don't think a pure implementation is
possible. In my opinion, what is being discussed is the best way of coping
with one aspec
Congratulations Dániel!
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 8:21 PM Otto Fowler wrote:
> std::cout << “Congratulations” << std::endl;
>
>
>
>
> On October 25, 2019 at 12:38:20, Aldrin Piri (ald...@apache.org) wrote:
>
> Apache NiFi community,
>
> On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce
+1 (binding)
verified signature and checksums. built without issue on my ubuntu rig.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 8:00 PM Koji Kawamura wrote:
> +1 (biding)
>
> Ran through the release helper guid. Built successfully and ran
> example flows worked as expected.
>
> Note for others using old macOS.
> I
Looks like I missed the vote by a smidge, but I did work through the helper
guide on mxlinux 18 with no issues. So, I'll cast a post-vote +1!
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:33 PM Arpad Boda wrote:
> Apache NiFi Community,
>
> I am pleased to announce that the 0.7.0 release of Apache NiFi MiNiFi
> C+
+1 (binding)
successfully went through the helper guide on mxlinux 18, did not discover
any issues with the signature, hashes, or build.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:48 AM Aldrin Piri wrote:
> +1, binding
>
> comments:
> signature - good
> hashes - good
> L&N - good
> built and tested some simple
+1 (binding)
Ran through "helper" on ubuntu without issue.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 7:23 PM Matt Gilman wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for RMing Joe!
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 6:06 PM M Tien wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > - Verified checksums, signatures, and commit hash
> > - Ran bu
+1 (binding)
Ran through the helper, compiled no problem, ran without issue, and didn't
see issues with licenses.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:54 AM Arpad Boda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache
> NiFi Registry nifi-registry-0.6.0.
>
> The sou
NiFi Community,
On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Arpad Boda
has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC.
In addition to being a regular code contributor and engaged community
member with the project, (especially MiNiFi C++!) for quite some time,
Ar
NiFi Community,
On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Drew Lim
has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC.
Drew has been doing an amazing job for several years making NiFi more
approachable and usable. He's contributed to almost every part of NiFi;
goi
All,
I've seen the discussion started on other projects [1][2], so I wanted to
kick off a discussion to determine whether this is something nifi could
look at too. Allen Wittenauer's post to yetus captures the why and some of
the how, so rather than copy and pasting, you can take a look at what he'
>
> >> I am a proponent of making this change and also using allow/deny list,
> >> meddler-in-the-middle, etc.
> >>
> >> Here is a blog [1] with easy instructions for executing the change in
> git,
> >> although I don’t know if there is any Apache-
; > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org
> > > > > > > alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > He/Him
> > > > > > > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D
> > EF69
> > > >
I did testing of a set of s3 processors a long while ago without AWS using
https://s3ninja.net/
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:17 PM younggyu Chun
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7579 but I think
> we
> need an AWS S3 account to test.
>
> thanks,
> younggy
> > feel
> > > > > like those teams are missing the mark on that. If we do find
> language
> > > > that
> > > > > needs to be changed in descriptor name fields, I think it would
> also
> > > > > prevent any problems by mak
ira and work on a
pr for that.
Most prevalent in my grep analysis related to master/slave were carrying
over terms from dependencies (e.g. MySQL, zookeeper, or third-party libs in
nifi-cpp) and "master key" crypt related stuff.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020, 6:02 PM Tony Kurc wrote:
> Mike
+1 (binding)
Built on an ubuntu 16.04 x64 w/openjdk 11 without issues. Verified
signatures and hashes. Saw no issues with LICENSE or NOTICE.
Tony
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:10 PM Marc Parisi wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Verified sigs and hashes
>
> Built and run on Linux LXC (Java 11) w/ Secured Ap
Congrats Marton!
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:02 AM Arpad Boda wrote:
> Apache NiFi community,
>
> On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Marton
> has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi
> project. We greatly appreciate all of Marton's
+1 (binding)
Verified checksums and signature. No issues building or running. Did not
see any issues with LICENSE or NOTICE.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, 5:07 AM Pierre Villard
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Went through the usual steps. Deployed a secured cluster on GCP and tried a
> few flows. Confirmed
yeah!!
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:50 PM Mark Payne wrote:
> Awesome! Thanks for doing all the work to get the release out, Joe!
>
> -Mark
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Aug 18, 2020, at 4:48 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> >
> > Apache NiFi Community,
> >
> > I am pleased to announce that the 1.12.0 re
+1 (binding)
Built with openjdk 1.8, reviewed license,notice, and checked signature and
hashes.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 9:25 AM Kotaro Terada wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified signatures and hashes.
> Built packages with OpenJDK 1.8 and OpenJDK 11.
> Set up a secure 3-node cluster.
> Confi
+1 (binding)
Verified signature and hashes. Built without issue on ubuntu 18.04 x86_64
with openjdk11. Saw no issues with LICENSE or NOTICE.
Tony
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020, 6:10 PM Joe Witt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi
> 1.12.1.
>
>
Joe,
In addition to your suggestions, were you thinking of making this processor
disabled by default as well?
Tony
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 11:04 PM Joe Witt wrote:
> Team
>
> While secure by default may not be practical perhaps ‘not blatantly wide
> open’ by default should be adopted.
>
> I think
+1 (binding)
Built with java 8. Verified checksums and signature. Ran a really simple
flow without issue.
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021, 6:56 PM David Handermann
wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Verified release signatures and expected files.
> Verified build on Ubuntu 20.10 using Apache Maven 3.6.3 with Azu
+1 (binding)
Built on Amazon Linux 2 with the below build configuration (using
bootstrap.sh). Verified signature and checksum files. Reviewed LICENSE and
NOTICE, which looked good. Had some test failures, but appear to be
environmental rather than an issue. Ran a simple flow without issue.
The fo
+1 (binding)
Verified checksums and signature.
Build and ran simple flow on Amazon Linux 2, openjdk 1.8.0, maven 3.6.3.
Saw no issues with LICENSE or NOTICE
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:29 AM Joe Witt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi
>
+1 (binding)
Went through the release helper, verified signatures and hashes, reviewed
NOTICE and LICENSE, and built without issues on Amazon Linux 2. Qualifier
on my +1 vote - I only tested the build with simple a very simple flow.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 3:50 PM Ferenc Gerlits wrote:
> Hello,
congratulations!
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 6:23 PM Joe Witt wrote:
> Congrats and thanks Marton
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 3:10 PM Otto Fowler
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Arpad Boda
> > Reply: dev@nifi.apache.org
> > Date: June 24, 2021 at 15:01:31
> > To: NiFi
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Also everyone the convenience binaries have been uploaded to here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-0.2.1/
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Bryan Bende wrote:
> > +1 (bindin
Personally not a fan of the idea. Maybe something analogous to something
like 'lock the taskbar' in Windows that can have a system default setting
and a user preference of on or off.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 11:44 AM, johny casanova
wrote:
> I agree it is easy to move it delete something by mistak
Ryan,
Having develop and master was due to the influence of git flow [1].
[1] http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Joey Echeverria wrote:
> Currently master is the same as the last release tag.
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Ryan Blue w
yes!
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Tony,
>
> If I recall correctly you setup nabble. I think it is still point
> at/referring to incubator. Can you please take a look and adjust?
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
Task completed, also, I can add admins.
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> yes!
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
>
>> Tony,
>>
>> If I recall correctly you setup nabble. I think it is still point
>> at/referring to incuba
yes
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> I am happy to help that too. Can you send me login info pls.
>
> Thanks
> On Sep 5, 2015 1:21 PM, "Tony Kurc" wrote:
>
> > Task completed, also, I can add admins.
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015
+1 (binding)
no issues building, hashes and signatures look good
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * Checked build signature, checksums
> * Built nifi-0.3.0
> * Ran rat checks
>
> rb
>
>
> On 09/16/2015 02:05 AM, Jennifer Barnabee wrote:
>
>> Everything ch
has anyone tried using fuse [1] to accomplish something like what Kathy was
asking?
[1] https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/MountableHDFS
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Kathy,
>
> In short, no. But this is a good idea. Our content repository
> implementations today expect acces
I'd like to see Duo Web two-factor https://www.duosecurity.com/docs/duoweb
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Rick Braddy wrote:
> 1) Basic password authentication with Recaptcha after N failed logins
> (encrypted password storage)
>
> 2) 2-factor Google Auth option to supplement password logins
>
All,
The Apache NiFi PMC has voted to allow volunteers to be a Committer without
being on the PMC, and votes for membership of these groups can now happen
separately. Previously, we had only considered the two roles together.
We'll be adding the following language to the web page, which clarifies t
I pushed a branch, NIFI-747 based off pull request (#104).
Hoping someone can review the changes I made to the PR before I squash and
merge into master.
Tested that it works as expected when migrating from not having the
property. The pr was very close, I had to handle just one case of
unexpected
I've been experimenting with using Apache Yetus for pull requests. Its
still early in development, but helps do a lot of the "double check code"
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:54 PM, dan bress wrote:
> Aldrin,
>Awesome, I appreciate your perspective on this. I'll check out option
> #2. Thanks!
Sean,
Can you better define "completed by a non-committer"?
Some cases to consider
Is "a jira" complete when a patch is submitted or when it is merged into
the code repository?
If a patch requires a bit of work to integrate (and test), where does that
fall?
What if a patch provider doesn't have a
Sean,
I think your footnote link got chopped.
Tony
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Well, I admit that my questions were as much to get more questions as
> to advance an idea of answers. :)
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> &
iling list thread the explanation references:
>
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4wHGYS
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> > Sean,
> > I think your footnote link got chopped.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4
NiFi Community!
Great news!
On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Ricky
Saltzer has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the
Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Ricky's hard work and
generous contributions to the project. We look forw
Mike,
I'm not quite following what you're trying to accomplish. The use case you
described was a bit too meta for me to wrap my head around. It sounds like
a dataflow abstraction layer with nifi as a backing engine. It sounds like
you have some code, is it in a public repo so we could take a look a
rin was doing. Consistency would be good, I
noticed other "styles" like this, which is more of a functional log.
https://github.com/apache/nifi/commit/da28b81eece1277c7500f28708155239ae317e57
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> > That would be wonderful. Would
If i recall correctly, 2.6.2 is in in release candidate stage. For 0.4
would that be a better target? I haven't had a chance to look at client
code changes
On Oct 23, 2015 9:32 AM, "rickysaltzer" wrote:
> Github user rickysaltzer commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/ni
Some are (like me). The process of reject/accept is challenging to
coordinate.
rejecting you send a notice message back to the sender.
>
>
> [1]: http://apache.org/dev/committers.html#mail-moderate
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> > Tony Kurc is the other moderator at this time.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sea
2015 at 10:08 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> > Yes, of course. I meant to address Joe's initial concern that by not
> > keeping up with incoming messages spam might leak through.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> >> Sean,
> >&
because it is a distributed
process.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Alex Moundalexis
wrote:
> If another moderator is needed, I'm happy to volunteer. I may not write a
> lot of code but I know spam when I see it.
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
>
> >
All,
I wanted to start a conversation about projects that are good for people
using or developing NiFi, but either can't or don't belong in the source
tree. This could be due to licensing issues (for example not compatible (or
not yet determined if it is compatible (GPL [1])) with the Apache Licens
; Perhaps a wiki page linking to these is good provided we have the
> above sort of disclaimer and a healthy recognition such references
> will become stale...
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> > All,
> > I wanted to start a con
ight be time now...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Oleg Zhurakousky
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> Tony, plenty of opinion but so are the questions/concerns.
> > >>>>> Managing it on GitHu
I've been using apache yetus locally to merge github prs.
test-patch.sh
--plugins="maven,asflicense,checkstyle,whitespace,findbugs,github"
--github-repo=apache/nifi 88
This pulls it from github as a patch, the autobuilds and checks style and
findbugs. Still some rough edges. I'm using a fork of y
Jeff,
What did you have JAVA_HOME set to?
can you do a 'find /usr/lib/jvm -name javac'
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Jeff wrote:
> The only other message I see is
>
> [WARNING] Unable to autodetect 'javac' path, using 'javac' from the
> environment.
>
> No worries, it can wait.
>
> Thanks,
>
Jeff,
Were you able to run that find command?
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Jeff wrote:
>
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Total time: 8.091 s
> [INFO] Finished at: 2015-11-03T12:08:59-06:00
> [INFO] Final Memor
; I had JAVA_HOME set to
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.65-2.b17.el7_1.x86_64/jre
>
>
>
> > On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> >
> > Jeff,
> > Were you able to run that find command?
> >
> > On Tue,
Huzzah
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Jeff wrote:
>
> I removed openjdk and installed the Oracle jdk and it now works.
>
> Thanks for the help!!
>
> > On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:40 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> >
> > it is entirely possible that you only have the jre
Regardless of if you're using merge or rebasing then merge (rebasing is
nice because then you can generally fast-forward merge to your targeted
branch) generally conflicts arise. Getting used to some tool for managing
merge conflicts is very important in distributed development. I prefer
doing it b
I'll review it now
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Matt Gilman
wrote:
> Thanks for reporting. This issue [1] has been addressed and is currently
> waiting for review before it can be merged.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matt
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1098
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at
Reviewed and patch incorporated into master
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> I'll review it now
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Matt Gilman
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for reporting. This issue [1] has been addressed and is currently
>> wai
I have a windows environment set up, and I believe I'm the one that pulled
that PR in so I know the code, I'll give it a go. Joe - did you submit a
ticket?
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Bryan Bende wrote:
> > I don't really have a way of t
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1106)
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> I have a windows environment set up, and I believe I'm the one that pulled
> that PR in so I know the code, I'll give it a go. Joe - did you submit a
> ticket?
>
> On
Pushed a patch to jira.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1106)
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
>
>> I have a windows environment set up, and I believe I'm the one that
>> pulled
Prompted by my review of pr 107, I had a question:
When folks are building/testing processors/services that use AWS services
like S3, how does a developer test against the service? I noticed Busbey
pointed out MSDN licenses, is there a similar situation for integrating
testing on AWS? Or are folks
thing worth bringing up to infra? or maybe fundraising?
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> > Prompted by my review of pr 107, I had a question:
> >
> > When folks are building/testing processors/services that use AWS services
> > like S3, how doe
Presuming it is off a recent commit, you should be able to read a delimited
tab file using "\t" as the delimiter. There should be a dropdown that will
allow you to choose ARRAY or NONE as a JSON container option, which would
toggle between the two JSON representations you described.
On Thu, Nov 5,
As we're providing source code, the repositories section in the pom are
more a "convenient pointer" than a "thou shalt use". Building using a
different repository of your choosing is as simple as adding a mirror in
your maven settings.
Because of this, I'm not even close to having an objection.
O
All,
For those not on the commits mailing list, in a push for 0.4.0 you may have
seen a flurry of changing fix versions and comments about readiness for
0.4.0 to assignees. Joe wrote an email about a target date a bit ago, and
so Joe or I made some reasonable guesses about whether the ticket would
.0 RC1.
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> > All,
> > For those not on the commits mailing list, in a push for 0.4.0 you may
> have
> > seen a flurry of changing fix versions and comments about readiness for
> > 0.4.0 t
Understood! We appreciate the contribution!
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Venkatesh Sellappa
wrote:
> @trkurc: " We're going to try to get this into 0.4.0 release of NiFi - I
> can
> make the changes, or if you have a patch in progress, I'll work off of that
> "
>
> - I have been travelling an
how do people feel about slipping NIFI-1054 in right before the release of
0.4.0? It is just code/whitespace cleanup, but will make merging code a bit
more challenging once applied, and a release seems like a reasonable
"checkpoint"
Tony
I don't object. Has anyone explored customization options for confluence to
make it more 'in theme' with the web page?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Jenn,
>
> This is great. I'm going through and updating a few of them now as you
> suggest.
>
> All,
>
> Is anyone opposed to
The response I got was on my ask to amazon was "we have a free tier, which
you can use without costb for 1 year".
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> I fired a note to the amazon team. Yes, I'd say that this is probably
> worth bringing up to some other par
All, I was code reviewing and something occurred to me. This raised my
eyebrow:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/TestExecuteStreamCommand.java#L63
If I'm reading it right, the
Joe, I built on windows 7 without issue. I have a win 10 box, will try
tonight to recreate there
On Nov 11, 2015 11:08 PM, "Joe Percivall"
wrote:
> I like the thought but I just tried replacing all the "/" with
> File.separator and it still failed the same way. I also tried it also on
> testPutFi
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-61 - awaiting an answer before
patch can be completed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 - Based on feature branch
activity, is close?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-696 - awaiting a patch marking
method as deprecated (assigned to m
>
> > - - - - - -
> > Joseph Percivall
> > linkedin.com/in/Percivall
> > e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 6:23 PM, Tony Kurc
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > All, I was code reviewing and s
of those
> three classes i can do that.
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> > Do you plan to undo the removal?
> > On Nov 12, 2015 4:46 PM, "Joe Witt" wrote:
> >
> >> well that explains these goofball classes
I ran a
% mvn findbugs:findbugs -pl
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/ -DskipTests
noticed this scrolled by. Is there a problem with the couchbase pom that
already has a ticket? I failed to find one.
[WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effectiv
Update:
Presumably fixed by NIFI-1086 (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting revision
NIFI-61
NIFI-812
NIFI-980
NIFI-1009
NIFI-1086
NIFI-1133
Multiple Auths (Matt Gilman) no patch yet, making progress
NIFI-655
Provenance Search Improvement (Oleg Zhurakousky) PR in, being reviewed by
Tony Kurc
NIFI
ecommend moving to 0.5.0)
>
> NIFI-1164 (this should get fixed now - it makes builds unreliable)
>
> NIFI-1165 (should tackle now. have a windows laptop i can build on)
>
> Thanks for pushing tony.
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> > Update:
>
the issue with a best practices guide on this subject is it will be
dominated by edge cases. The common case should be "don't produce any
threads".
That being said, I commented on a jira somewhere about LinkedBlockingQueues
used in so many producer/consumer style processors and possibly needing a
We have many places where we have Thread.sleep(..) and in fact do sleep
> considerable amount of time. That thread lays dormant where it could
> actually be doing something. Is it necessary?
>
> Cheers
> Oleg
>
>
> > On Nov 16, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> >
> &
I agree with Joe
On Nov 18, 2015 2:02 PM, "Joe Witt" wrote:
> Oleg
>
> How about you keep it in github for now. We can make a page or section on
> the website that points to community supported utilities that helps folks
> get underway?
>
> Anyone else see it differently?
>
> Thanks
> Joe
> On N
I've reviewing Joseph Percivall's NIFI-1081. It added
org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.util.SoftLimitBoundedBAOS
How do we feel about BAOS vs ByteArrayOutputStream?
Also, it was heavily based on Hadoop's implementation of I believe
org.apache.hadoop.io.BoundedByteArrayOutputStream [1]
The bel
> Joseph Percivall
> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
> e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 6:26 PM, Tony Kurc
> wrote:
> I've reviewing Joseph Percivall's NIFI-1081. It added
> org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.util.SoftLimitBoundedBAOS
1 - 100 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
