Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-22 Thread Joe Witt
Ok it is all in. Starting RC build. Please do not tag anything else to 1.19. If necessary I'll pull things in. 1.20 has been established. Thanks On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:51 AM Joe Witt wrote: > Gonna wait for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10857 as this > was apparently made bi

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-22 Thread Joe Witt
Gonna wait for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10857 as this was apparently made bigger and some tests broken from another 1.19 JIRA. Probably gonna kick out the RC tomorrow and then let the vote run through Monday. Thanks On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 9:56 AM Mike Thomsen wrote: > Can so

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-18 Thread Mike Thomsen
Can someone do a quick review on this? I think it would be a nice little bullet point on our release to say we added preliminary support for Neo4J 5 since it's so new. https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6684 (Enabling the V5 profile has a hard dependency on Java 17) On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:0

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-18 Thread Joe Witt
Goodness. Some pretty cool collaboration on things like the docker updates and NiFi 1.19 is looking healthy. Time permitting, I'd like to start the RC today. Thanks On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:16 PM Kevin Doran wrote: > NIFI-10701 is merged. If folks are ok holding off a day or two more for >

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-15 Thread Kevin Doran
NIFI-10701 is merged. If folks are ok holding off a day or two more for 1.19, I'll look into following the work Ferenc Kis did for that to knock out NIFI-10820. On Nov 15, 2022 at 19:43:57, Matt Burgess wrote: > Awesome, thanks all! I'd like to wait for Github actions to be happy > and then mer

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-15 Thread Matt Burgess
Awesome, thanks all! I'd like to wait for Github actions to be happy and then merge? On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 7:11 PM Mark Bean wrote: > > NIFI-10703 has been worked through. I think it's good to go now. > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 4:43 PM Matt Burgess wrote: > > > I can take that review too, if

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-15 Thread Mark Bean
NIFI-10703 has been worked through. I think it's good to go now. On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 4:43 PM Matt Burgess wrote: > I can take that review too, if your suggestions are incorporated. I > started looking the other day but didn't get to dig in. I'll try to > reproduce in the meantime. > > Regard

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-15 Thread Matt Burgess
I can take that review too, if your suggestions are incorporated. I started looking the other day but didn't get to dig in. I'll try to reproduce in the meantime. Regards, Matt On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 4:42 PM Nathan Gough wrote: > > We might also want https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-15 Thread Nathan Gough
We might also want https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10787 On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 4:05 PM Mark Bean wrote: > I will be on it in about 2 hours, if not addressed sooner. > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 3:46 PM Joe Witt wrote: > > > NIFI-10703 would be great to get in. Just a matter of gett

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-15 Thread Matt Burgess
Mark, I can review any incoming changes when they land, if that helps. Regards, Matt On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 4:05 PM Mark Bean wrote: > > I will be on it in about 2 hours, if not addressed sooner. > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 3:46 PM Joe Witt wrote: > > > NIFI-10703 would be great to get in. J

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-15 Thread Mark Bean
I will be on it in about 2 hours, if not addressed sooner. On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 3:46 PM Joe Witt wrote: > NIFI-10703 would be great to get in. Just a matter of gettin' it done and > merged I think. You're on it? > > Thanks > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 1:38 PM Mark Bean wrote: > > > Sorry..

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-15 Thread Joe Witt
NIFI-10703 would be great to get in. Just a matter of gettin' it done and merged I think. You're on it? Thanks On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 1:38 PM Mark Bean wrote: > Sorry.. check that. There's a typo in the latest commit on that PR. > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 3:35 PM Mark Bean wrote: > > > Cou

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-15 Thread Mark Bean
Sorry.. check that. There's a typo in the latest commit on that PR. On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 3:35 PM Mark Bean wrote: > Could we get NIFIDEVS-10703 (PR #6638) in there too? AFAIK, it's good to > go. > > Thanks, > Mark > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 2:56 PM Joe Witt wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-15 Thread Mark Bean
Could we get NIFIDEVS-10703 (PR #6638) in there too? AFAIK, it's good to go. Thanks, Mark On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 2:56 PM Joe Witt wrote: > Hello All, > > I plan to kick off the RC as soon as > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10701 is merged. > > Thanks > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 1

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-15 Thread Joe Witt
Hello All, I plan to kick off the RC as soon as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10701 is merged. Thanks On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:52 PM David Handermann < exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote: > Joe, > > Thanks for initiating the discussion. I agree with moving toward a 1.19.0 > relea

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-10 Thread David Handermann
Joe, Thanks for initiating the discussion. I agree with moving toward a 1.19.0 release instead of 1.18.1 given over 150 Jira issues already tagged with 1.19.0. We should start another thread soon regarding 2.0. One of the key things to do before that, however, would be to finish adding deprecatio

[discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

2022-11-10 Thread Joe Witt
Team, We keep getting a slew of emails on various lists, slack, and the security list about commons text. We need a 1.18.1 or a 1.19.0. Given all that has already happened on 1.19.0 I'm inclined to just 'do that' release and get it going. I know we need to start getting serious about 2.0 but pe