Thanks Joe!
From: Joe Witt
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 12:56 PM
To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: MiNiFi C++ JSON library efficiency
instead of assigning you the ticket we can add you as a contributor in
the minifi JIRA and then you can assign yourself
___
> From: Marc
> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 9:33 AM
> To: dev@nifi.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MiNiFi C++ JSON library efficiency
>
> Hi Andy,
>Perhaps the ease of use was the motivating factor. You bring up an
> excellent point, though. The trade off is likely o
: Marc
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 9:33 AM
To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: MiNiFi C++ JSON library efficiency
Hi Andy,
Perhaps the ease of use was the motivating factor. You bring up an
excellent point, though. The trade off is likely one to make given the
numbers you provided . If you haven&#
Hi Andy,
Perhaps the ease of use was the motivating factor. You bring up an
excellent point, though. The trade off is likely one to make given the
numbers you provided . If you haven't already created a jira ticket to
track this I can. I'm supportive of reviewing alternative dependencies
given c
All,
I noticed that jsoncpp was added as a dependency in MINIFI-274. I'm currently
working a branch with an earlier root which uses RapidJSON.
What was the motivation behind jsoncpp? Looking at the benchmarks, RapidJSON is
significantly more efficient in terms of both CPU and memory [1]. The
d
