++
-Original Message-
From: Julien Nioche
Reply-To: "u...@nutch.apache.org"
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:45 AM
To: "dev@nutch.apache.org"
Cc: "u...@nutch.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Remove pom.xml from source
&g
gt;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Nioche
> Reply-To: "u...@nutch.apache.org"
> Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:36 AM
> To: "dev@nutch.apache.org" , "u...@nutch.apache.org"
>
> Subject: [VOTE] Remove pom.xml from source
>
>
ginal template
and then what ant deploy spits out, no?
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Julien Nioche
Reply-To: "u...@nutch.apache.org"
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:36 AM
To: "dev@nutch.apache.org" , "u...@nutch.apache.org"
Subject: [VOTE] Remove
Hi Talat
Don't you remember https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1371? ;-)
Julien
On 15 July 2014 11:50, Talat Uyarer wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> [+1] We can remove pom.xml
>
> I wonder Why don't we switch our dependency management ivy+ant to maven ?
> Most of IDEs works very good with ma
Hi Julien,
[+1] We can remove pom.xml
I wonder Why don't we switch our dependency management ivy+ant to maven ?
Most of IDEs works very good with maven.
Talat
2014-07-15 13:36 GMT+03:00 Julien Nioche :
> Hi,
>
> One of the frequent issues on the mailing list / JIRA is that users can be
> led
Hi,
One of the frequent issues on the mailing list / JIRA is that users can be
led to think that Nutch is built with Maven as they can see what looks like
a perfectly valid pom.xml at the root of the project. It becomes clearer
when reading the WIKI or FAQ that ANT should be used instead but it is
6 matches
Mail list logo
