Build failed in Jenkins: NuttX-Nightly-Build #99

See Changes: -- [...truncated 296.07 KB...] Configuration/Tool: sim/sixlowpan -

Re: Test jobs failing due to timeouts?

There has been a workaround in place for the last few hours, but if anyone notices a failure please tag me in the PR and I'll try and dig in further. --Brennan On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, 4:26 AM Xiang Xiao wrote: > The situation become more worse today: many PR fail with timeout even > I manually re

Re: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

Interesting solution for MCU to FPGA comm: https://jeelabs.org/2016/11/a-fast-%C2%B5c-to-fpga-bus/ On 4/17/20, disruptivesolution...@gmail.com wrote: > @Nathan > Maybe I am just a simple soul .but the root concept is (seems to be) > shared memory. Memory which is some sort of "topic" where an

Re: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

Maybe I am just a simple soul .but the root concept is (seems to be) shared memory. Memory which is some sort of "topic" where an MCU is a "subscriber" and where there is some sort of "applicational" orchestration. A kafka bus on memory 😉 I think I am getting it, but where I am struggli

RE: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

@Nathan Maybe I am just a simple soul .but the root concept is (seems to be) shared memory. Memory which is some sort of "topic" where an MCU is a "subscriber" and where there is some sort of "applicational" orchestration. A kafka bus on memory 😉 I think I am getting it, but where I am str

RE: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

I added (git cloned some elementary files: libmetal and open-amp) and I have got it build and compiled in Nuttx again. Now looking at videos how I could use it. My "sensor" core (slave..?) is a STM32F4VE. Ben -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Gregory Nutt Verzonden: vrijdag 17 april 2020

Re: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

Yes, OpenAMP still here on NuttX and AFAIK everything is fine. But I think OpenAMP is not feasible for this scenario where you have two isolated boards, but Xiang could tell us, he and his team integrated it on NuttX. Assumed that the poster was referring to the many processors with built-in

Re: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:20 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > > Hi Nathan, > > Yes, OpenAMP still here on NuttX and AFAIK everything is fine. > > But I think OpenAMP is not feasible for this scenario where you have > two isolated boards, but Xiang could tell us, he and his team > integrated it o

Re: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:13 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 8:49 AM wrote: > > > Very interesting... but Openamp was removed right? > > > Removed?! > > It's in the root directory of nuttx repo. > > Did something break it? > Yes, the recent change break some functionality, b

Re: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

Hi Nathan, Yes, OpenAMP still here on NuttX and AFAIK everything is fine. But I think OpenAMP is not feasible for this scenario where you have two isolated boards, but Xiang could tell us, he and his team integrated it on NuttX. BR, Alan On 4/17/20, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 202

Re: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 8:49 AM wrote: > Very interesting... but Openamp was removed right? Removed?! It's in the root directory of nuttx repo. Did something break it? Nathan

RE: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

Very interesting... but Openamp was removed right? Ben -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Daniel Pereira Carvalho Verzonden: vrijdag 17 april 2020 14:27 Aan: dev@nuttx.apache.org Onderwerp: Re: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et Hi, Did you think about an a

Re: Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

Hi, Did you think about an asymmetric multiprocessor? This way you can use a Cortex-M4 with nuttx and a Cortex-A5/A7 to run the sensor fusion algorithm. Daniel Pereira de Carvalho Em sex., 17 de abr. de 2020 às 08:54, escreveu: > All, > > > > I want to experiment with sensor fusion. Nuttx is

Algorithm and Nuttx integration other platforms AI..Kalman..et....

All, I want to experiment with sensor fusion. Nuttx is the sensor "collector" and does this in a great way. I want to use python for adding algorithms and micro python is gone. With reason I think. And the embedded platform Cortex-M4's mostly are not suited for this job. To slow in general.

Re: Test jobs failing due to timeouts?

The situation become more worse today: many PR fail with timeout even I manually rerun the job several time.:( On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:52 AM Brennan Ashton wrote: > > This is an issue with GitHub unfortunately and got worse recently. I'll > make some changes to the job that should help make thi

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 6:26 PM David Sidrane wrote: > > How about in the commit hooks? > Yes, we can add pre-commit script to tools folder, but developer still need to copy the hook into .git/hooks folder manually. And we also need enable all same check on github/apache server as the last quali

RE: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

How about in the commit hooks? -Original Message- From: Xiang Xiao [mailto:xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 7:47 PM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6 On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 5:54 AM David Sidrane wrote: > > Thank you for fixin

Re: [PATCH] nshlib/nsh_codeccmd.c: fix potential NULL dereference and check malloc return values

Hi Xiang, Are the PRs really any efficient if there is someone else doing nxstyle cleanups after each change? The build failures due to obvious misspellings should be corrected *fast*, so I don't want to delay things by going through entire file with nxstyle. I'm not very keen on this whole Apa