Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

+1 for the Tshirt idea That can also be our own "uniform" for the next NuttX conference Regards Alin On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 8:20 AM David Alessio wrote: > Before it's too late, I'd like to pose the question: > Is there no-one who prefers NuttX be spelled with lower-case "utt"? > > Respectful

api stability in apps/netutils/webclient

hi, i want to add some stuff to apps/netutils/webclient. for example, * ability to report http status to the caller * ability to add some request headers * put * other content-type for post * tls a question: how much api stability is expected for this? can i just add extra arguments to wget() et

Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:20 AM David Alessio wrote: > Before it's too late, I'd like to pose the question: > Is there no-one who prefers NuttX be spelled with lower-case "utt"? I'm confused by your question: Haven't we been spelling it NuttX? Nathan

Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

Before it's too late, I'd like to pose the question: Is there no-one who prefers NuttX be spelled with lower-case "utt"? That is the way the the registered trademark is spelled.. with lower case utt

Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

I think David is referring to the ideas given in the attached document, where NuttX is spelled all upper case (NUTTX) On Thu, May 28, 2020, 13:40 Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > > >> Before it's too late, I'd like to pose the question: > >> Is there no-one who prefers NuttX be spelled with lower-case

Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 9:32 AM Abdelatif Guettouche wrote: > > I think David is referring to the ideas given in the attached document, > where NuttX is spelled all upper case (NUTTX) Well I think it should be spelled NuttX. Because as Greg points out: On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 8:40 AM Gregory Nu

Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

Exactly! It is written NuttX (not: nuttx, Nuttx, nuttX, NUTTX, etc) Before we start the pool we need to find a better site to put it, confluence will not allow external user to update file to it. BR, Alan On 5/28/20, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 9:32 AM Abdelatif Guettouche

Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:28 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Before we start the pool we need to find a better site to put it, > confluence will not allow external user to update file to it. A GitHub repository? incubator-nuttx-logo? People could open pull requests. We should prefer SVG (or

Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

Hi Nathan, On 5/28/20, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:28 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis > wrote: >> Before we start the pool we need to find a better site to put it, >> confluence will not allow external user to update file to it. > > A GitHub repository? incubator-nuttx-logo? Peo

Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

We should prefer SVG (or other widely-available and preferably open vector format) because that will allow the logo to be blown up to huge sizes or shrunk down to tiny sizes, without losing resolution or getting a blocky look. Yes! SVG is recommended by W3C and many image editors support it.

Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

On Thu, May 28, 2020, 10:06 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > >> We should prefer SVG (or other widely-available and preferably open > >> vector format) because that will allow the logo to be blown up to huge > >> sizes or shrunk down to tiny sizes, without losing resolution or > >> getting a blocky loo

Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 1:14 PM Brennan Ashton wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2020, 10:06 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > We should complicate that. Justin said that Apache services could do > > any image conversions that we need. We should not restrict people if we > > don't need to > > Long as it is a

Re: The new Apache NuttX Logo

Glad to hear that. A mascot like Linux penguin would make the brand name more recollective. No matter the community wouldn't like any of the proposals, at least, it's worth trying, I think. Well, if Zephyr weren't using that logo, it would be one of my suggestions. (Don't ask me why. Lol) I don't

Re: api stability in apps/netutils/webclient

i want to add some stuff to apps/netutils/webclient. for example, * ability to report http status to the caller * ability to add some request headers * put * other content-type for post * tls a question: how much api stability is expected for this? Of course we would like the code to be sta

Build failed in Jenkins: NuttX-Nightly-Build #174

See Changes: -- [...truncated 137.29 KB...] Configuration/Tool: rddrone-uavcan144/nshdebug,CONFIG_

Re: api stability in apps/netutils/webclient

hi, On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 7:00 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > > i want to add some stuff to apps/netutils/webclient. > > for example, > > > > * ability to report http status to the caller > > * ability to add some request headers > > * put > > * other content-type for post > > * tls > > > > a que