On 6/11/2023 11:42 AM, Tim Hardisty wrote:
Where should that be in the (current) documentation? I’ll go and add it as I
didn’t know this.
I am not very familiar with the new documentation. There should be a
document about creating board support and that document should discuss
the content o
Yes, we will have mixed presentations (real/virtual).
On 6/11/23, Mark Stevens wrote:
> Are you allowing remote presentations ?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
> _
> Blog: blog.thepcsite.co.uk
> Twitter: @nevynuk
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 11 Jun 2023, at 14:52, Alan C. Assis wrote:
>>
>> P
Where should that be in the (current) documentation? I’ll go and add it as I
didn’t know this.
From: Gregory Nutt
Reply to: "dev@nuttx.apache.org"
Date: Sunday, 11 June 2023 at 18:16
To: "dev@nuttx.apache.org"
Subject: Re: STM32 and GDB - How do I generate the ELF file?
On 6/11/2023 11:07 AM,
On 6/11/2023 11:16 AM, Gregory Nutt wrote:
On 6/11/2023 11:07 AM, Mark Stevens wrote:
Is there any reason for not having the extension?
To me the extension adds information about the file.
The name is actually BIN = nuttx$(EXEEXT) but EXEEXT is not normally
defined.
Different toolchains ge
yes we do and we would be happy to see many speakers around the globe for
the NuttX Iinternational Workshop
Best regards
Alin
On Sun, 11 Jun 2023, 17:34 Mark Stevens, wrote:
> Are you allowing remote presentations ?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
> _
> Blog: blog.thepcsite.co.u
On 6/11/2023 11:07 AM, Mark Stevens wrote:
Is there any reason for not having the extension?
To me the extension adds information about the file.
The name is actually BIN = nuttx$(EXEEXT) but EXEEXT is not normally
defined.
Different toolchains generate executable images in different format
Is there any reason for not having the extension?
To me the extension adds information about the file.
Regards,
Mark
_
Blog: blog.thepcsite.co.uk
Twitter: @nevynuk
> On 11 Jun 2023, at 17:19, Petro Karashchenko
> wrote:
>
> The nuttx file is actually an ELF fil
The nuttx file is actually an ELF file, but without .elf extension.
BR,
Petro
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023, 10:39 AM Mark Stevens wrote:
> I think the missing piece of information is that the nuttx file contains
> the debug symbols.
>
> Thanks for your time and help.
>
> Regards,
> Mark
> _
Are you allowing remote presentations ?
Regards,
Mark
_
Blog: blog.thepcsite.co.uk
Twitter: @nevynuk
> On 11 Jun 2023, at 14:52, Alan C. Assis wrote:
>
> Please submit your proposal:
>
> https://events.nuttx.apache.org
Personally I think debug symbols should be off by default. The default
position for any OS should always be small, fast and most importantly, secure.
Different modes are a great way of solving this. Visual Studio has had this
for as long as I have been using it.
Regards,
Mark
Please submit your proposal:
https://events.nuttx.apache.org
You are welcome Mark!
There is a PR proposing to enabling it by default:
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/9499
To be honest I don't know if it will be a good idea.
Probably some company will forget to disable it and will ship the
firmware with debug symbols enabled.
Sometime ago a company r
I think the missing piece of information is that the nuttx file contains the
debug symbols.
Thanks for your time and help.
Regards,
Mark
_
Blog: blog.thepcsite.co.uk
Twitter: @nevynuk
> On 10 Jun 2023, at 22:10, Alan C. Assis wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Could you
13 matches
Mail list logo
