Thank you for your feedback, Alan!
Alan, David,
I created the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2010/
Edi
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 9:17 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis
wrote:
> Hi Eduard,
>
> Yes, the modification appears correct.
>
> Also I noticed that the "nxsem_wait_uni
Hi Eduard,
Yes, the modification appears correct.
Also I noticed that the "nxsem_wait_uninterruptible(&priv->txsem)" is
already inside a "#ifdef CONFIG_STM32H7_SPI_DMA", so your modification
will make the logic symmetric.
You just need to create a fork, do your modification and submit a PR.
BR,
@nuttx.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: nuttx\arch\arm\src\stm32h7\stm32_spi.c uses txresult even
when SPI_DMA is not defined
I attached it as .txt.
*Please note:* I made the code build and the SPI seems to work as expected
- I am communicating with an at45db flash over SPI and mounted smartFS on
it and the
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 1:28 PM Eduard Niesner
wrote:
> I attached it as .txt.
>
> *Please note:* I made the code build and the SPI seems to work
> as expected - I am communicating with an at45db flash over SPI and mounted
> smartFS on it and the communication seems to work. I am not sure if
> th
I attached it as .txt.
*Please note:* I made the code build and the SPI seems to work as expected
- I am communicating with an at45db flash over SPI and mounted smartFS on
it and the communication seems to work. I am not sure if the changes that I
did are enough or if the entire spi_interrupt func
Hi Eduard,
Unfortunately the mailing list is refusing patches with extension
.patch, we need to rename it to .txt to get it here.
BTW, you can submit a Pull Request directly to
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx and we could review it.
BR,
Alan
On 10/16/20, Eduard Niesner wrote:
> Hi a
