[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Howe updated OFBIZ-71:
Attachment: googCheckout.patch
removed absolute path and apache grant
> Ofbiz with google checkout.
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Howe updated OFBIZ-71:
Attachment: googCheckout.patch
removed absolute path
> Ofbiz with google checkout.
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Howe updated OFBIZ-71:
Attachment: googCheckout.patch
googCheckout.patch
replaces previous patch with same name
creates service an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470010
]
Anil K Patel commented on OFBIZ-679:
David, Thanks for you time.
> Create Maintenance plan using Template WorkEff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Howe updated OFBIZ-71:
Attachment: googCheckout.patch
googCheckout.patch
I've changed my direction of how to implement this.
It se
Yes, very interesting indeed !
Jacques
Very interesting find Chris - thanks for the pointer.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Feb 3, 2007, at 7:26 AM, Chris Howe wrote:
There's been an interestin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-679.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Assignee: David E. Jones
Thanks Anil, thi
When an inventory transfer is initiated for only a portion of an
inventory item, that inventory item is split - a new inventory item
is created for the quantity to be transferred, and appropriate
inventory item detail records are created (a negative adjustment for
the existing item, and a p
Why change it then? Why put the effort into it, and then require
corresponding review effort?
Why comment "the +/- notation does not work well with PostgreSQL"?
Either way I don't care a lot, as long as it's clear what is being
fixed and what is just being changed because "I like my way be
Very interesting find Chris - thanks for the pointer.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Feb 3, 2007, at 7:26 AM, Chris Howe wrote:
There's been an interesting discussion going on in the
Incubator-general list regarding both the
There's been an interesting discussion going on in the
Incubator-general list regarding both the community and legal aspects
of development outside the ASF and submitting code by proxy.
http://www.nabble.com/-Vote--Incubating-Project-Policy-tf3158407.html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469949
]
Ismail Cansiz commented on OFBIZ-683:
-
Thanks Jacques,
I'm sory for the wrong path.
> Viewing Party Communicati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469948
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-618:
---
Fred,
Take a look at
while (vti.hasNext()) {
Hi David,
I was involved in fixing this issue. There was a genuine bug where the
inventory reservation with FIFO method was ordered the wrong way, causing it to
behave like LIFO. This commit fixes the issue by reversing the order for the
FIFO case so it works correctly.
So unless you want
14 matches
Mail list logo
