Hello all,
I saw the implementation of service deletePartyRelationship
In the service it use remove-value which deletes the record form the
database. But here i think It should expire.
Please make me correct if i am wrong.
Thanks
Sumit Pandit
What is the meaning of the SettlementTerm entity?
Is it an old entity or something created during the very initial GL
design and never implemented.
By looking at its seed data it seems to me a duplication of the
payment terms as already implemented in the OrderTerm and InvoiceTerm
entities.
This is finally reverted in rev. 651193
Jacopo
On Apr 14, 2008, at 7:05 AM, David E Jones wrote:
+1 from me on the revert as well (making it clear as it is only
implied in my initial reply).
-David
On Apr 12, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
No feedback on this?
However, a
Thanks for answering everyone.
David, thanks for the advice.
I checked the entities you mentioned WorkEffort, RecurrenceInfo, and
RecurrenceRule, but cannot figure it our how to achieve the same
functionality.
It is possible to store the promotion hours in WorkEffort entity
(actualStartDate -
Bruno, Marco,
I'm currently working with a person who help me to add and fix french labels. I have to check translations because, as you know,
it's very specific, and this takes time. So I'd like to finish as much as possible this work before working on
I should have say that I have currently 4 files pending. As soons as I will validate and commit this files, I will look on Jira
issue. Of course any reviews of Bruno's work in the meantime is welcome.
Sorry to call upon your patience
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruno,
Hi Jacques,
I would like to translate missing labels in Italian but without any urgency
also because I'm very busy with other projects.
Thanks a lot
Marco
I should have say that I have currently 4 files pending. As soons as I will
validate and commit this files, I will look on Jira
issue.
Looking forward to the big labels cleanup...
-Bruno
2008/4/24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Jacques,
I would like to translate missing labels in Italian but without any urgency
also because I'm very busy with other projects.
Thanks a lot
Marco
I should have say that I have
Usually for join entities with effective dates (from/thru dates)
(like PartyRelationship) the delete service does actually delete the
record. If you want to expire the record, just use the update service.
-David
On Apr 24, 2008, at 12:08 AM, Sumit Pandit wrote:
Hello all,
I saw the
Hi list,
Just in case someone may have developed an OFBiz-OpenSign component but
I don't know, is there any OFBiz component on opensign?
TIA,
Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd.
On Apr 24, 2008, at 1:45 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
What is the meaning of the SettlementTerm entity?
Is it an old entity or something created during the very initial GL
design and never implemented.
By looking at its seed data it seems to me a duplication of the
payment terms as already
I can not open the xml files of ofbiz application
-
Key: OFBIZ-1757
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1757
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: ecommerce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-1757.
-
Resolution: Invalid
I doubt this has anything to do with OFBiz and everything to do with your IDE.
Try
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12592174#action_12592174
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1757:
The new feature explosion is now most implemented and shows , in speed
as a big improvement. However
Part of the problem to select the respective variant is now done after
the features are selected. Because of the datamodel it takes a long time
to find the applicable variant if there are many.
Why not just use a view-entity to reduce round-trips to the database
and select by the productId and the relevant feature ids?
-David
On Apr 24, 2008, at 8:44 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
The new feature explosion is now most implemented and shows , in speed
as a big improvement. However
the problem is that the actual variants are stored in productAssoc and
the standard features in different records of productFeatureAppl
any idea how this view would look like?
so i want a variant from product assoc which has all the selected
features on the screen as standard features in
You would need to join the ProductFeatureAppl entity into the view
multiple times (once for each feature selected).
-David
On Apr 24, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
the problem is that the actual variants are stored in productAssoc and
the standard features in different records of
David, thanks for your help,
i would understand that if they were different fields...but these are
the same fields with different values on different records.
regards,
Hans
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 22:44 -0600, David E Jones wrote:
You would need to join the ProductFeatureAppl entity into the
19 matches
Mail list logo
