[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rishi Solanki closed OFBIZ-2717.
Resolution: Fixed
As per description given in my last comment all the desired functionality
relate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731810#action_12731810
]
Rishi Solanki commented on OFBIZ-2717:
--
User Manual :
* Goto -
https://localhost
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anil K Patel reassigned OFBIZ-2731:
---
Assignee: Anil K Patel
> voidPayment service should reverse the accounting transaction in sam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shi Yusen updated OFBIZ-2723:
-
Attachment: localization-zh-09.04-applications-manufacturing.patch
localization-zh-09.04-a
On Jul 16, 2009, at 1:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:
My question is why payment is captured when the invoice status is
In-Process? Shouldn't the system look for Invoice Ready status to
capture the payments.
If what I said above is true, I could use the existing artifacts
and do some changes
On Jul 15, 2009, at 7:21 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Coming back to my question a little bit, in the Verify Order step
8, I do not want to capture payment and which is logical because
Invoice status is In-Process status.
My question is why payment is captured when the invoice status is
Hans,
Thanks for looking into the issue. This seems to be a good idea to me.
It will bring things inline with best practices.
Regards
Anil Patel
On Jul 16, 2009, at 9:13 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
I would like to ask the community about the following change.
Currently the screens and forms fil
I would like to ask the community about the following change.
Currently the screens and forms files in the system for the Entity
CustRequest are called RequestForms.xml and RequestScreens.xml
if you work pretty often in this area it still happens pretty frequently
that i cannot find them because
search in PROMOTIONS category causes ScreenRenderException
--
Key: OFBIZ-2733
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2733
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
Just make sure the Facetoface(POS) is considered.
in that one you want
1) immeadiate response to CC status
2) immeadiate payment of Cash.
Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/15/2009 6:46 AM:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start talking about possible improvements in the way
> Orders are asso
On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:35 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi,
I have introduced a feature called Verify Pick in Facility component
few months back based on a requirement. I was reviewing the code
more closely and found some issues.
The pre-condition to run this process is that order is in approved
Bob,
Which user is it that you would like to capture, the one who called
the quick ship service? Are there other services that the user you
want to track will call?
Either way I guess you have 2 options:
1. trace down through the service you know the user will call to see
if/where the u
On Jul 15, 2009, at 8:19 AM, Joe Eckard wrote:
Last week I created a patch that allows PO entry without requiring a
ProductStore. The main change is that when creating a new
ShoppingCart, the productStoreId and currencyUom parameters can be
null (currencyUom will be set to the system defau
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731548#action_12731548
]
Si Chen commented on OFBIZ-2729:
Somebody can use a CSR's credentials to try to reset a p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sumit Pandit closed OFBIZ-2732.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Accidentally created. (same as OFBIZ-2731). I apologized.
> voidPayment servi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731482#action_12731482
]
Sumit Pandit commented on OFBIZ-2731:
-
Thanks Arpit for contribution.
> voidPayment se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sumit Pandit updated OFBIZ-2731:
Attachment: OFBiz_2731.patch
Patch is attached for given description.
> voidPayment service should
voidPayment service should reverse the accounting transaction in same state
(posted/unposted) as it was origanally there.
--
Key: OFBIZ-2732
U
voidPayment service should reverse the accounting transaction in same state
(posted/unposted) as it was origanally there.
--
Key: OFBIZ-2731
U
Last week I created a patch that allows PO entry without requiring a
ProductStore. The main change is that when creating a new
ShoppingCart, the productStoreId and currencyUom parameters can be
null (currencyUom will be set to the system default if null). I would
like to commit this soon, d
Oh, I see now - I hadn't looked closely at the patch and thought
another type of note had been created. Can we call (and label) this
new note a "Public Note" or "Public Order Note" instead of a "Shipping
Note"?
-Joe
On Jul 15, 2009, at 2:27 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi Joe,
I am sorry that
Hi Vikas,
On Jul 15, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi,
I have introduced a feature called Verify Pick in Facility component
few months back based on a requirement. I was reviewing the code
more closely and found some issues.
The pre-condition to run this process is that order is
Hi all,
I would like to start talking about possible improvements in the way
Orders are associated to Payments.
Currently the OrderPaymentPreference entity is associated to the
PaymentGatewayResponse entity and also the status of the payment is
tracked in the OrderPaymentPreference.statusId
I guess the question remains that either it's a pattern we've employed as a
best practice in OFBiz or not. If it is - then Hans do the needful and stop
making up your own practices - if not, then Anil let Hans decide on the
variable names when he's making commits. My personal vote is that we s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Awdesh Singh Parihar updated OFBIZ-2730:
Attachment: OFBiz-2730.patch
-- Imlemented test case to test service depositWithdra
Junit test for the "depositWithdrawPayments"
Key: OFBIZ-2730
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2730
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: accounting
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anil K Patel resolved OFBIZ-2720.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Applied update in r794235.
> Add statusId field to the FinAccountTrans entity
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Surya Kusumakar updated OFBIZ-2720:
---
Attachment: AddedStatusIdToFinAccountTrans.patch
Did minor modification in migration service.
I did some changes for what I described earlier and I think this would
be the correct way to generate invoice for shipment. Changes are
copied below for reference.
Vikas
Index: applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/shipment/verify/
VerifyPickSession.java
=
Hi,
I have introduced a feature called Verify Pick in Facility component
few months back based on a requirement. I was reviewing the code more
closely and found some issues.
The pre-condition to run this process is that order is in approved
status.
Steps to do Verify Pick are:
1) Creat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731382#action_12731382
]
Anil K Patel commented on OFBIZ-2717:
-
Applied patch to r794217. Not closing he issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anil K Patel reassigned OFBIZ-2717:
---
Assignee: Anil K Patel (was: Ashish Vijaywargiya)
> Add a new "Deposit/Withdraw" screen to t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sumit Pandit reopened OFBIZ-2720:
-
Reopened issue for a improvement in efficiency.
Use tag for iteration. Thanks Vikas for report.
>
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 15:29 +0530, Anil Patel wrote:
> Hans,
> Sure I will not mind if you change ftl's into form widget as long as
> FUNCTIONALITY is not lost.
>
the same is true when you change the projectInfo variable...
--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
Correction inline.
On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
Hans,
Sure I will not mind if you change ftl's into form widget as long as
FUNCTIONALITY is not lost.
Rest Inline.
Regards
Anil Patel
On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
I do not understand your variable hunti
Hans,
Sure I will not mind if you change ftl's into form widget as long as
FUNCTIONALITY is not lost.
Rest Inline.
Regards
Anil Patel
On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
I do not understand your variable hunting.
both project and projectinfo are not entities. :-)
In cont
I do not understand your variable hunting.
both project and projectinfo are not entities. :-)
Feel free to change them, i hope then that you do not mind if i change
your ftl's into forms
Regards,
Hans
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 14:36 +0530, Anil Patel wrote:
> Hans,
> I am interested to kno
Hans,
I am interested to know motivation for renaming project variable to
projectInfo. Ofbiz best practices (declared or assumed) recommend
using entity name for the variable name.
Unless there is specific reason I like to use project as variable name
instead.
Regards
Anil Patel
On Jul
38 matches
Mail list logo
