[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12756992#action_12756992
]
Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-2219:
hi sharan, your
From: Ashish Vijaywargiya ashish.vijaywarg...@hotwaxmedia.com
+1 for Scott's comment.
Consider the case:
Suppose for some time I stop directly committing my code on the trunk
and instead of that I start attaching the patch on JIRA.
Now here comes the ball in the hand of Jacques(As he is the
Thanks Vikas, and +1 fot both links (not sure how to distinc them though, minor
anyway)
Jacques
From: Vikas Mayur vikas.ma...@hotwaxmedia.com
Okay, this is reverted in rev. 816469 because of several reasons
1. The services written for these new pages need to be revisited again and are not
Who said anything about requiring the company name? IMO both not
allowing and requiring company names are not worth trying to force
other people to do. In other words, my vote is no company name police,
either way.
-David
On Sep 17, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
+1
I think Ashish was pointing out that if a contributor supplies a patch
then they could request that their company is attributed in the commit
log. A committer would then be required to do so in order to be fair
to the contributor since committers are allowed to attribute their own
company
We already have so many rules, why is everyone in such a hurry to
make more?
-David
On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:56 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
I think Ashish was pointing out that if a contributor supplies a
patch then they could request that their company is attributed in
the commit log. A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-2783.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Brajesh, Rishi Anil for the contribution.
Special thanks to
I'm in no hurry to make any rules, it just seems more complicated to
me to allow company attribution than to disallow it, we've gotten by
fine all these years without it so why start?
Regards
Scott
On 18/09/2009, at 7:59 PM, David E Jones wrote:
We already have so many rules, why is
My vote would be to NOT enforce any rule on this; I don't see any
problems in commit logs with:
... Thanks to person (company name)
or similar.
If we will ever see people abusing with this (I don't think is
happening, happened or will ever happen) we can address this
specifically.
Thanks Jacopo, well put. That's exactly what I'm for.
-David
On Sep 18, 2009, at 2:58 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
My vote would be to NOT enforce any rule on this; I don't see any
problems in commit logs with:
... Thanks to person (company name)
or similar.
If we will ever see people
For this discussion I'd refer to these links
http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#hats
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
I know there are no strict rules about that, but don't forget that an ICLA is not a CCLA.
Regarding this aspect
... Thanks to person (company name)
is
On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I know there are no strict rules about that, but don't forget that
an ICLA is not a CCLA. Regarding this aspect
They are not definitely the same: without a CCLA, a committer, being
paid by a company to modify OFBiz, would not be
HR Clearance Functionality
--
Key: OFBIZ-2957
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2957
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: humanres
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richa Mittal updated OFBIZ-2957:
Attachment: Clearance_HR.patch
HR Clearance Functionality
--
Okay that makes sense, I guess I caused a bit of a storm in a tea cup,
sorry for that. It was just something I hadn't seen before and
perhaps overreacted to.
Regards
Scott
On 18/09/2009, at 9:13 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Thanks Jacopo, well put. That's exactly what I'm for.
-David
On
There are a few of us working on the seleniumXml test framework that was
added to the project a few weeks ago. I would like to continue improving
this framework and helping others add test cases for the project.
I'm looking for recommendations from the community on the following topics:
1.
Hi Brett
Comments inline
Regards
Scott
On 19/09/2009, at 12:44 AM, Brett Palmer wrote:
There are a few of us working on the seleniumXml test framework that
was
added to the project a few weeks ago. I would like to continue
improving
this framework and helping others add test cases for
Mmm, I don't want to be one who opened the Pandorax box...
It's ok with me!
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I know there are no strict rules about that, but don't forget that
an ICLA is not a CCLA.
Hi all,
some of the uilabels which are referring to the Ids are labelled, for
example for partyId Réf. de l'acteur.
I think this notation is a bit long, and it would be a good idea to
reduce the label only to Acteur.
Lots of users know that Acteur near a textbox or on a column header
means
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Geisert reassigned OFBIZ-2911:
Assignee: Christian Geisert
Extend webtools:LabelManager
Hi Brett,
As I've seen that you were having some improvements on the seleniumXml
work, I was waiting them to migrate some existing selenium tests we have
and work on your solution.
Can't wait to see it arrive !
Le 18/09/2009 14:44, Brett Palmer a écrit :
../..
--
Erwan
It's nice to at least have some clarity around it. The police will
come out when it's abused - my vote is still not to mention ANY
companies in these message, but just the people involved, but if we
want to allow it - I'm more than happy to support.
Thanks for working thru it all - much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12757213#action_12757213
]
Stephen Rufle commented on OFBIZ-2915:
--
Does that mean I should also modify
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-2958:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-2958.diff
Proposal on French translations
Proposal on French translations
---
Key: OFBIZ-2958
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2958
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: ALL COMPONENTS
Affects Versions: SVN
Hi Erwan,
I looked for this label (Réf means Id in French) in files and found those below. I put an OK where for me there are no pb, else I
explain my POV.
AccountingUiLabels.xml
value xml:lang=frRéf. de l'acteur propriétaire/value OK
HumanResUiLabels.xml (2 matches)
value xml:lang=frRéf.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-2958:
--
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Proposal on French translations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12757368#action_12757368
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2110:
OK, will see next year...
Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12757379#action_12757379
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2958:
Thanks Erwan,
Your (slightly momdified)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12757380#action_12757380
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2940:
Hi Jeremy,
This patch is a git patch, we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12757521#action_12757521
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-2915:
---
I would just do it locally so that we don't have to
31 matches
Mail list logo
