I would support any effort to add more control to the framework. I support
having many committers involved in the framework (so it doesn't become
stagnant), but at the same time it would be nice to have better control over
framework releases (so it can be reliable). David's suggestion of a se
--- On Tue, 5/4/10, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On May 4, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
> > I'm confused. What do you mean by "a more stable
> framework?" Is the framework currently unstable?
>
> I should have said probably "a more static framework"
Okay, that makes sense.
> > What do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
chris snow updated OFBIZ-3749:
--
Attachment: UtilHelpText.patch
> Field description tooltips show key if help text is not found
> --
Field description tooltips show key if help text is not found
-
Key: OFBIZ-3749
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3749
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Compon
On May 4, 2010, at 6:29 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>
> Is the hope for this proposal to avoid having to completely separate the
> framework from the applications?
No, this is not my goal: in fact I think that the first step (before any change
in our strategy) would be to resolve the dependency
On May 4, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> I'm confused. What do you mean by "a more stable framework?" Is the framework
> currently unstable?
I should have said probably "a more static framework"
>
> What do you mean by "more dynamic applications?"
This doesn't make a lot of sense, I
Hey Adrian,
While its true most don't go this way, if you bought some books from
Amazon then you would need to pay before they would ship ;-)
This kind of interaction happens when the transaction is between 2
businesses where the supplier is used to dealing with end consumers
rather than business
--- On Tue, 5/4/10, Scott Gray wrote:
> At some point for sure.
>
> The real and big problem with the content component is that
> it's almost impossible to figure out what the hell half the
> methods do. They're poorly written, poorly documented
> and in a lot of cases isn't doing things correct
At some point for sure.
The real and big problem with the content component is that it's almost
impossible to figure out what the hell half the methods do. They're poorly
written, poorly documented and in a lot of cases isn't doing things correctly
anyway. How do you write backwards compatibl
Hi Sam,
I would create a new Term Type of something like Prepayment Required and if
that's present on an order then just do the payment thing like you are now.
Ideally it would be known as a prepayment and it would get posted to the
ledgers appropriately and later when the good are received th
Yeah, that scenario sounds pretty specific. That's not how most US businesses
work.
-Adrian
--- On Tue, 5/4/10, Sam Hamilton wrote:
> From: Sam Hamilton
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r941132 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications:
> accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/PaymentServices.xml
>
Makes sense
+1
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz"
On May 5, 2010, at 1:10 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> Time to look at a JackRabbit integration?
>
> ;-)
>
> -Adrian
>
> --- On Tue, 5/4/10, lekt...@apache.org wrote:
Time to look at a JackRabbit integration?
;-)
-Adrian
--- On Tue, 5/4/10, lekt...@apache.org wrote:
> From: lekt...@apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r941139 -
> /ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/menu/MenuWrapTransform.java
> To: comm...@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, May
Hi Sam, Scott,
What ever happens we always need the payment record. and this creation
saves time and, because the status is not paid it can be used when the
payment is actually done.
we can discuss about the payment date. Hoever I think that is well
covered by the agreements if available
Regards
This looks wrong to me too. You don't know what to pay until the order has been
received.
-Adrian
--- On Tue, 5/4/10, Scott Gray wrote:
> From: Scott Gray
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r941132 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications:
> accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/PaymentServices.xml
Hi Scott,
So say add a Term Type on the Order Entry Order Terms page of the
Purchase Order workflow that would create the invoice immediately if
required a bit like selecting Payment (net days) = 0 days, which does
not work or we would have used that but I am sure you get my meaning.
Cheers
Sam
Hi Sam,
It sounds like a shortcut is being taken in place of properly modeling the
business process.
I guess at the very least an agreement of some sort should be attached to the
order which results in the payment being created. That would be your "switch",
the payment is only generated if th
Spotted an error in my wording it should be:
>From my understanding of the flow of OFBiz you need to create the
Purchase Order, approve it and then once the goods have been received in
full the Purchase Invoice is generated which then kicks in the
Agreements which you set during the creation of th
Hi Scott,
We will ring a supplier and get a quote for a product, agree the terms
e.g. pay first then they send the goods or 30 days credit or pay on
delivery of goods. Then create a Purchase Order and then wire them the
payment, the goods will then be delivered to our warehouse where we
receive ag
Surely they invoice you beforehand though?
The payment should be created based on that.
Regards
Scott
On 5/05/2010, at 2:28 PM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Its for suppliers who need the payment of the invoice before the goods
> will be shipped e.g. they don't give credit.
>
> Sam
>
>
Yeah the order total is an estimate and then an invoice is generated (I think?)
using the quantities received and the order's estimate. The invoice is just an
internal representation of the supplier's invoice which we may not have even
seen yet.
I would say that we shouldn't be attempting to a
Hi Guys,
Its for suppliers who need the payment of the invoice before the goods
will be shipped e.g. they don't give credit.
Sam
On 05/05/2010 10:24, BJ Freeman wrote:
> more for my understanding, I believe an invoice for a PO is internal not
> sent to the supplier, if I remember a previous thr
more for my understanding, I believe an invoice for a PO is internal not
sent to the supplier, if I remember a previous thread on the ml.
and that it is used to reconcile against the invoice received from the
supplier.
I did something similar.
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.
Hi Hans,
Wouldn't you do this when an order is received (i.e. an invoice created) rather
than when the order is placed?
Typically payment due dates are based on the invoice date not the order date.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 5/05/2010, at 1:43 PM, hans...@apache.
Hi Erwan, thanks for your help.
Regards,
Hans
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:03 +0200, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
> Le 02/05/2010 10:11, Hans Bakker a écrit :
> > Hi David,
> > 1. i select myportal -> the main page is shown -> is fine
> > 2. i select 'mycomms' within myportal -> expecting mycomms, it
Hi Jacques,
As per Sharan's report on the user list, you've incorrectly changed the
productId lookup target from LookupProduct to LookupProductCategory.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 8/04/2010, at 10:19 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jleroux
> Date: Thu Apr
The Buildbot has detected a restored build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/3370
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 9410
Le 28/04/2010 09:42, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Hi Erwan,
I have noticed that you have left the jar:
framework/catalina/lib/tomcat-6.0.16-tomcat-juli-adapters.jar
Is it something we should remove?
Yes, done at 941006. I was thinking it was somehow useful, but I was
wrong...
Jacopo
--
Er
Le 04/05/2010 18:36, David E Jones a écrit :
Erwan,
If this works you should go ahead and commit it. It looks like this code is
kind of a hack anyway, so I wouldn't worry about a hack on a hack (in other
words, it doesn't look any quicker or dirtier than the existing code there, so
that shou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nicolas malin updated OFBIZ-3647:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3647.patch
Hi Scott
I update the patch improvement has you wish.
Sorry for t
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/3369
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 941017
Erwan,
If this works you should go ahead and commit it. It looks like this code is
kind of a hack anyway, so I wouldn't worry about a hack on a hack (in other
words, it doesn't look any quicker or dirtier than the existing code there, so
that shouldn't stop you from committing it).
Thanks for
Is the hope for this proposal to avoid having to completely separate the
framework from the applications? My first thought reading this was that it
would probably be necessary to separate the two so dependencies only go one way
(ie applications depend on the framework, framework does not depend
Le 04/05/2010 10:22, Shiny Vijyaraghavan a écrit :
Hi,
I am pretty new to Ofbiz. I am trying to create a "Total available leave"
function in OfBiz HR module. I would like to reuse the ListEmplLeaves form
to list out the current taken leaves of the employee. Sssuming I have the
partyId available,
I'm confused. What do you mean by "a more stable framework?" Is the
framework currently unstable?
What do you mean by "more dynamic applications?"
-Adrian
On 5/4/2010 12:04 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
What if we start evaluating a different way we organize our svn, daily work and
release st
I come from a time when everything was modularize similar to ofbiz.
I go by the principle that if one line of code is changed the whole
program is suspect for errors.
each modules was determined to have it own life cycle. Therefore if only
one module is changed it is the only one suspect for errors
Hi,
I am pretty new to Ofbiz. I am trying to create a "Total available leave"
function in OfBiz HR module. I would like to reuse the ListEmplLeaves form
to list out the current taken leaves of the employee. Sssuming I have the
partyId available, which I would take from the session, How do I pass t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863830#action_12863830
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-2104:
It would be nice to have the menu widget support t
Le 02/05/2010 10:11, Hans Bakker a écrit :
Hi David,
1. i select myportal -> the main page is shown -> is fine
2. i select 'mycomms' within myportal -> expecting mycomms, it is
showing 'main' -> not fine!
3. if i select 'profile' -> expecting profile but showing 'main' -> not
fine!
4. if i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863809#action_12863809
]
Atul Vani commented on OFBIZ-3468:
--
Thanks Jacques
> No Message for duplicate login name
Done at r940811
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
Yes, I plan to remove them. I have still to read more about svn merge...
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
We don't really need that mergeinfo stuff do we?
The actual diff looks like a needle in a haystack.
Regards
Scott
On 3/05/2010, at 3:54 AM, jl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3468.
--
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Fix Version/s: Release Branch 10.04
SVN tr
Hans,
In this particular case you just need to force the system to set the
shipment status to Received i.e PURCH_SHIP_RECEIVED
You can do this by selecting the checkbox "Set Shipment as Received"
on Receive Inventory screen.
This will change the quantity on OrderItem and ShipmentItem to t
Le 04/05/2010 01:47, Scott Gray a écrit :
There is flotr for javascript charting which I "think" uses prototype. But due
to the integration with BIRT I would like to see a chart widget schema defined that uses
BIRT as the rendering engine. It's also possible that we could integrate BIRT with
What if we start evaluating a different way we organize our svn, daily work and
release strategy?
We may try to move in the direction of having a more stable framework and more
dynamic applications.
A very simple strategy would be the following one:
all the changes to the framework (that are no
45 matches
Mail list logo
