Re: svn commit: r952119 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/widget/ applications/order/widget/ordermgr/ applications/party/widget/partymgr/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ applications/pro

2010-06-07 Thread Scott Gray
Quite a few of those links don't actually look like they needed to be secured i.e. there is no event attached to that uri, orderview for example. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 7/06/2010, at 7:02 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jleroux > Date: Mon Jun 7 07:02

Re: svn commit: r952119 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/widget/ applications/order/widget/ordermgr/ applications/party/widget/partymgr/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ applications/pro

2010-06-07 Thread Scott Gray
On second look there were no targets in this commit that needed to be secured. Regards Scott On 7/06/2010, at 7:18 PM, Scott Gray wrote: > Quite a few of those links don't actually look like they needed to be secured > i.e. there is no event attached to that uri, orderview for example. > > Reg

Re: svn commit: r952119 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/widget/ applications/order/widget/ordermgr/ applications/party/widget/partymgr/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ applications/pro

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I quickly used regex S/R. I wrongly put the 2 orderview (I removed a lot more) but thought the other were real actions as they have Edit as prefix in their names. Actually I did not check if they were calling an event. I just did and you are right. Anyway it does not hurt, and it's finally a goo

Re: svn commit: r952119 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/widget/ applications/order/widget/ordermgr/ applications/party/widget/partymgr/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ applications/pro

2010-06-07 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Jacques, In a small way it does hurt because whenever we use "post" instead of "get" the user will be prompted "do you want to submit the form again?" when they click the back button on the browser to go back to one of those screens. But yeah I wouldn't rely on searching alone unless you are

Re: (sales) invoice item types missing

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Willem, I can't see any reasons why they should not be there, committers? Willem, you don't need to watch a Jira issue when you are the reporter, it's automatically done ;o) Without comments I will commit Willem's patch... Jacques Willem Janssen wrote: Hi, When creating an item for a sa

Re: (sales) invoice item types missing

2010-06-07 Thread Scott Gray
I started to look at it a while ago but then ran out of time, I can however say that no type records are missing from the database some of them are just inconsistently named. As to types missing from the drop-down, yes I agree that it is an issue. Regards Scott On 7/06/2010, at 8:37 PM, Jacque

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3537) Not all sales invoice item types are showing in listInvoiceItems screen

2010-06-07 Thread Scott Gray (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Gray updated OFBIZ-3537: -- Attachment: InvoiceItemType.txt Willem, I don't know if it's of any use to you but I'm attaching a tree

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3808) Dojo Version Update to 1.4 - Umbrella Main Task

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3808: --- Summary: Dojo Version Update to 1.4 - Umbrella Main Task (was: Dojo Version Update to 1.

Re: svn commit: r952119 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/widget/ applications/order/widget/ordermgr/ applications/party/widget/partymgr/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ applications/pro

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Ha well, I did not thought about that, thanks! I revert... Jacques Scott Gray wrote: Hi Jacques, In a small way it does hurt because whenever we use "post" instead of "get" the user will be prompted "do you want to submit the form again?" when they click the back button on the browser to go

Re: svn commit: r952119 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/widget/ applications/order/widget/ordermgr/ applications/party/widget/partymgr/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ applications/pro

2010-06-07 Thread Scott Gray
Thanks Jacques Regards Scott On 7/06/2010, at 9:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Ha well, I did not thought about that, thanks! > > I revert... > > Jacques > > Scott Gray wrote: >> Hi Jacques, >> >> In a small way it does hurt because whenever we use "post" instead of "get" >> the user will

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3809) Update Dojo Libary

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3809. -- Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Resolution: Fixed Thanks Sascha, Done at r952157 in Dojo1.4 br

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3808) Dojo Version Update to 1.4 - Umbrella Main Task

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-3808: -- Assignee: Jacques Le Roux > Dojo Version Update to 1.4 - Umbrella Main Task > -

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3809) Update Dojo Libary

2010-06-07 Thread Sascha Rodekamp (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12876204#action_12876204 ] Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3809: Hey that's cool. Thanks Jacques So let's

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3810) Content Navigation Tree don't work with the new Prototype

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12876206#action_12876206 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3810: After an ant run-install, for now I get th

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3812) The ONePage Checkout don't work with the Dojo 1.4 (we use 1.4.3 in branch Dojo1.4)

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3812: --- Summary: The ONePage Checkout don't work with the Dojo 1.4 (we use 1.4.3 in branch Dojo1.4)

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3810) Content Navigation Tree don't work with Dojo 1.4 (we use 1.4.3 in branch Dojo1.4)

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3810: --- Summary: Content Navigation Tree don't work with Dojo 1.4 (we use 1.4.3 in branch Dojo1.4) (

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3787) Make Party Relationship Helper more common

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3787. -- Resolution: Invalid This was not complete an I reverted at r952187.I will not reopen as I will

[jira] Reopened: (OFBIZ-3787) Make Party Relationship Helper more common

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-3787: > Make Party Relationship Helper more common > -- > >

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-2882) EntityList cache clearing issues when removing generic entity via DelegatorImpl

2010-06-07 Thread Bob Morley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12876240#action_12876240 ] Bob Morley commented on OFBIZ-2882: --- I believe the V2 set of patches just need a review a

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3813) Lookup LookupCustRequestItem goes wrong when layered

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
Lookup LookupCustRequestItem goes wrong when layered Key: OFBIZ-3813 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3813 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Jacques Le R

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3813) Lookup LookupCustRequestItem goes wrong when layered

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3813: --- Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Fix Version/s: Release Branch 10.04

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3798) Add generic service to call xml-rpc request

2010-06-07 Thread Nicolas Malin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Malin updated OFBIZ-3798: - Attachment: XmlRpcEngine.patch I recreate a patch with a new xml-rpc service engine, It's a draft

Re: svn commit: r952156 - /ofbiz/branches/release09.04/revert.bat

2010-06-07 Thread Adrian Crum
Shouldn't the eol-style property be set to native? -Adrian On 6/7/2010 2:05 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote: Author: jleroux Date: Mon Jun 7 09:05:00 2010 New Revision: 952156 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952156&view=rev Log: May help sometimes Added: ofbiz/branches/release09.04/r

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3813) Lookup LookupCustRequestItem goes wrong when layered

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3813. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed at r952249 in trunk and r952253 in R10.04 > Lookup LookupCustRequestIt

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3813) Lookup LookupCustRequestItem goes wrong when layered

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3813: --- Parent: OFBIZ-3445 Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug) > Lookup LookupCustRequestItem go

Re: svn commit: r952156 - /ofbiz/branches/release09.04/revert.bat

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Why? It's only used locally and shoud not be modified, do you see a reason? (same for 10.04 branch) Jacques From: "Adrian Crum" Shouldn't the eol-style property be set to native? -Adrian On 6/7/2010 2:05 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote: Author: jleroux Date: Mon Jun 7 09:05:00 2010 New Revis

Re: svn commit: r952156 - /ofbiz/branches/release09.04/revert.bat

2010-06-07 Thread Adrian Crum
It was my understanding that our svn clients should be configured to set all text files to eol-style:native. Why would this file be any different? -Adrian On 6/7/2010 7:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Why? It's only used locally and shoud not be modified, do you see a reason? (same for 10.04 bra

[jira] Reopened: (OFBIZ-3746) Lookup Layer Search of a Varient Product

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-3746: I found some issueS while working on OFBIZ-3813: * If you use the variant lookup on a 2d page

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3746) Lookup Layer Search of a Varient Product

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3746: --- Attachment: Weird variant lookup for WG-9944.jpg screenshoot: "Weird variant lookup for WG-99

Re: svn commit: r952156 - /ofbiz/branches/release09.04/revert.bat

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Mmm... actually I thought that I had not to worry about that, since it's included into the subversion config file. http://ofbiz.apache.org/svn/config There I read *.dsp= svn:eol-style=CRLF *.bat= svn:eol-style=CRLF *.dsw= svn:eol-style=CRLF *.sh = svn:eol-style=

Re: svn commit: r952156 - /ofbiz/branches/release09.04/revert.bat

2010-06-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Anyway, done at r952278 Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" Mmm... actually I thought that I had not to worry about that, since it's included into the subversion config file. http://ofbiz.apache.org/svn/config There I read *.dsp= svn:eol-style=CRLF *.bat= svn:eol-style=CRLF *

Re: (sales) invoice item types missing

2010-06-07 Thread Willem Janssen
Hi Scott, Jacques, Thanks for looking into this and providing for a breakdown structure of the invoice item types. It helps to get an overview of the topic. ...unwatching future issues from now :) Willem Op 7 jun 2010, om 10:47 heeft Scott Gray het volgende geschreven: I started to look a

Shopping list problem in ecommerce component

2010-06-07 Thread rrhati2010
Hi, When I create a new shopping list , every time i click on create new button it creates a new shopping list with same nameHow can I avoid creating shopping list with same name??... Please help. - RRH -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Shopping-list-p