Quite a few of those links don't actually look like they needed to be secured
i.e. there is no event attached to that uri, orderview for example.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 7/06/2010, at 7:02 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jleroux
> Date: Mon Jun 7 07:02
On second look there were no targets in this commit that needed to be secured.
Regards
Scott
On 7/06/2010, at 7:18 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
> Quite a few of those links don't actually look like they needed to be secured
> i.e. there is no event attached to that uri, orderview for example.
>
> Reg
I quickly used regex S/R. I wrongly put the 2 orderview (I removed a lot more) but thought the other were real actions as they have
Edit as prefix in their names. Actually I did not check if they were calling an event. I just did and you are right.
Anyway it does not hurt, and it's finally a goo
Hi Jacques,
In a small way it does hurt because whenever we use "post" instead of "get" the
user will be prompted "do you want to submit the form again?" when they click
the back button on the browser to go back to one of those screens.
But yeah I wouldn't rely on searching alone unless you are
Hi Willem,
I can't see any reasons why they should not be there, committers?
Willem, you don't need to watch a Jira issue when you are the reporter, it's
automatically done ;o)
Without comments I will commit Willem's patch...
Jacques
Willem Janssen wrote:
Hi,
When creating an item for a sa
I started to look at it a while ago but then ran out of time, I can however say
that no type records are missing from the database some of them are just
inconsistently named.
As to types missing from the drop-down, yes I agree that it is an issue.
Regards
Scott
On 7/06/2010, at 8:37 PM, Jacque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray updated OFBIZ-3537:
--
Attachment: InvoiceItemType.txt
Willem, I don't know if it's of any use to you but I'm attaching a tree
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3808:
---
Summary: Dojo Version Update to 1.4 - Umbrella Main Task (was: Dojo
Version Update to 1.
Ha well, I did not thought about that, thanks!
I revert...
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacques,
In a small way it does hurt because whenever we use "post" instead of "get" the user
will be prompted "do you want to submit the
form again?" when they click the back button on the browser to go
Thanks Jacques
Regards
Scott
On 7/06/2010, at 9:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Ha well, I did not thought about that, thanks!
>
> I revert...
>
> Jacques
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> In a small way it does hurt because whenever we use "post" instead of "get"
>> the user will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3809.
--
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Sascha,
Done at r952157 in Dojo1.4 br
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-3808:
--
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
> Dojo Version Update to 1.4 - Umbrella Main Task
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12876204#action_12876204
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3809:
Hey that's cool. Thanks Jacques
So let's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12876206#action_12876206
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3810:
After an ant run-install, for now I get th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3812:
---
Summary: The ONePage Checkout don't work with the Dojo 1.4 (we use 1.4.3 in
branch Dojo1.4)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3810:
---
Summary: Content Navigation Tree don't work with Dojo 1.4 (we use 1.4.3 in
branch Dojo1.4) (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3787.
--
Resolution: Invalid
This was not complete an I reverted at r952187.I will not reopen as I will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-3787:
> Make Party Relationship Helper more common
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12876240#action_12876240
]
Bob Morley commented on OFBIZ-2882:
---
I believe the V2 set of patches just need a review a
Lookup LookupCustRequestItem goes wrong when layered
Key: OFBIZ-3813
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3813
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Jacques Le R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3813:
---
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Fix Version/s: Release Branch 10.04
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin updated OFBIZ-3798:
-
Attachment: XmlRpcEngine.patch
I recreate a patch with a new xml-rpc service engine, It's a draft
Shouldn't the eol-style property be set to native?
-Adrian
On 6/7/2010 2:05 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Mon Jun 7 09:05:00 2010
New Revision: 952156
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952156&view=rev
Log:
May help sometimes
Added:
ofbiz/branches/release09.04/r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3813.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed at r952249 in trunk and r952253 in R10.04
> Lookup LookupCustRequestIt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3813:
---
Parent: OFBIZ-3445
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug)
> Lookup LookupCustRequestItem go
Why? It's only used locally and shoud not be modified, do you see a reason?
(same for 10.04 branch)
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
Shouldn't the eol-style property be set to native?
-Adrian
On 6/7/2010 2:05 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Mon Jun 7 09:05:00 2010
New Revis
It was my understanding that our svn clients should be configured to set
all text files to eol-style:native. Why would this file be any different?
-Adrian
On 6/7/2010 7:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Why? It's only used locally and shoud not be modified, do you see a
reason? (same for 10.04 bra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-3746:
I found some issueS while working on OFBIZ-3813:
* If you use the variant lookup on a 2d page
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3746:
---
Attachment: Weird variant lookup for WG-9944.jpg
screenshoot: "Weird variant lookup for WG-99
Mmm... actually I thought that I had not to worry about that, since it's
included into the subversion config file.
http://ofbiz.apache.org/svn/config
There I read
*.dsp= svn:eol-style=CRLF
*.bat= svn:eol-style=CRLF
*.dsw= svn:eol-style=CRLF
*.sh = svn:eol-style=
Anyway, done at r952278
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
Mmm... actually I thought that I had not to worry about that, since it's
included into the subversion config file.
http://ofbiz.apache.org/svn/config
There I read
*.dsp= svn:eol-style=CRLF
*.bat= svn:eol-style=CRLF
*
Hi Scott, Jacques,
Thanks for looking into this and providing for a breakdown structure
of the invoice item types. It helps to get an overview of the topic.
...unwatching future issues from now :)
Willem
Op 7 jun 2010, om 10:47 heeft Scott Gray het volgende geschreven:
I started to look a
Hi,
When I create a new shopping list , every time i click on create new button
it creates a new shopping list with same nameHow can I avoid creating
shopping list with same name??...
Please help.
-
RRH
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Shopping-list-p
33 matches
Mail list logo
