Hi Jacques,
I have updated the files now and committed to that svn a few days ago; however
I don't see it reflected in
http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/
Apart from committing the files, is there anything else I need to do in order
to deploy them?
Jacopo
On Nov 11, 2012, at 9:37
+1
On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.05 (major release number:
10.04; minor release number: 05), will supersede the release Apache
OFBiz 10.04.04.
+1
On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 11.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 11.04.02 (major release number:
11.04; minor release number: 02), will supersede the release Apache
OFBiz 11.04.01.
Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:
[+1] 7
[-1] 0
The minimum (3) number of +1 votes from PMC members has been reached: 6
positive votes from PMC members.
I will proceed with the remaining steps required to release the package.
Jacopo
Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:
[+1] 8
[-1] 0
The minimum (3) number of +1 votes from PMC members has been reached: 6
positive votes from PMC members.
I will proceed with the remaining steps required to release the package.
Jacopo
On 01/17/2013 11:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:
[+1] 8
[-1] 0
The minimum (3) number of +1 votes from PMC members has been reached: 6
positive votes from PMC members.
I will proceed with the remaining steps
On 01/17/2013 11:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:
[+1] 8
[-1] 0
The minimum (3) number of +1 votes from PMC members has been reached: 6
positive votes from PMC members.
I will proceed with the remaining steps
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 01/17/2013 11:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:
[+1] 8
[-1] 0
The minimum (3) number of +1 votes from PMC members has been reached: 6
positive votes from PMC members.
I will
On 01/17/2013 11:55 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 01/17/2013 11:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:
[+1] 8
[-1] 0
The minimum (3) number of +1 votes from PMC members has been reached: 6
On Jan 17, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Oh, and 3.5 days for voting is *NOT* enough time. Not by a long shot.
Are these the reasons you have missed mostly all the voting threads in the
OFBiz release history? :-)
On 01/17/2013 12:16 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jan 17, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Oh, and 3.5 days for voting is *NOT* enough time. Not by a long shot.
Are these the reasons you have missed mostly all the voting threads in the
OFBiz release history? :-)
That's a separate
On Jan 17, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Ie, how many total voters are there?
Everyone in the World can vote, we need at least 3 positive votes from PMC
members... I would recommend you to read the ASF voting guidelines.
Regards,
Jacopo
I think Adam's point was that someone could synthesize a vote from you (or,
more importantly a vote from a mostly dormant member like Adam) and get
something to pass. Since, in practice, this kind of thing doesn't ever seem to
happen its probably not worth worrying about but his point is still
On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:11 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
think Adam's point was that someone could synthesize a vote from you (or,
more importantly a vote from a mostly dormant member like Adam) and get
something to pass. Since, in practice, this kind of thing doesn't ever seem
to happen its
On 01/17/2013 01:18 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:11 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
think Adam's point was that someone could synthesize a vote from you (or,
more importantly a vote from a mostly dormant member like Adam) and get
something to pass. Since, in practice, this
I agree that more time should be allowed for voting, but in this
instance there was a need to get the release(s) out as soon as possible.
I also agree that an email can be forged, but in this case the vote
releases were mentioned on the private list before it appeared on the
public lists.
On 18/01/2013, at 9:10 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 01/17/2013 01:18 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:11 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
think Adam's point was that someone could synthesize a vote from you (or,
more importantly a vote from a mostly dormant member like Adam) and get
Hi Jacopo,
Last time you committed you got a port 1099 race condition.
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch10/builds/50/steps/compile_1/logs/stdio
Now (not sure why, but Gavin confirmed) we need to use different ports to build
on buldbot simultaneously.
Scott Gray wrote:
On 18/01/2013, at 9:10 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 01/17/2013 01:18 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:11 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
think Adam's point was that someone could synthesize a vote from you (or,
more importantly a vote from a mostly dormant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13556982#comment-13556982
]
Sumit Pandit commented on OFBIZ-5121:
-
Thanks Jacques for comments, I'll look in to
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-branch10 while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch10/builds/51
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: portunus_ubuntu
Build Reason: forced: by IRC
Hi Jacques,
the port race condition issue is a separate one and I don't think it is
related; in fact I see a new zip file created after my changes to the html
templates but the old templates are still used.
Should I create a ticket in Jira to ask how to deploy the modifications?
Jacopo
On
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Jacques,
the port race condition issue is a separate one and I don't think it is
related;
Agreed
in fact I see a new zip file created after my
changes to the html templates but the old templates are still used. Should I
create a ticket in Jira to ask how to
23 matches
Mail list logo
