Proposal: URL-Generation Changes

2013-02-09 Thread Paul Piper
Hey Everyone, over at ilscipio (www.ilscipio.com) we developed a set of functional OFBiz changes that we believe the entire community could benefit from. The changes have been implemented in parts in Syracus (www.syracus.net) for a while now, but we figured that some of which are too crucial for

Re: Proposal: URL-Generation Changes

2013-02-09 Thread Hans Bakker
better check the trunk version where we already implemented this? Regards, Hans On 02/09/2013 04:51 PM, Paul Piper wrote: Hey Everyone, over at ilscipio (www.ilscipio.com) we developed a set of functional OFBiz changes that we believe the entire community could benefit from. The changes have

Re: Proposal: URL-Generation Changes

2013-02-09 Thread Paul Piper
Hi Hans, this is not about the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5109, if that is what you are refering to... -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Proposal-URL-Generation-Changes-tp4639289p4639291.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at

Re: Proposal: URL-Generation Changes

2013-02-09 Thread Hans Bakker
No, Check the alternative url on category, product and content.. On 02/09/2013 05:36 PM, Paul Piper wrote: Hi Hans, this is not about the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5109, if that is what you are refering to... -- View this message in context:

Re: Proposal: URL-Generation Changes

2013-02-09 Thread Paul Piper
That also doesn't capture it. Here's just a few reasons why: - The current implementation tries to hide the actual /control request flow by creating a set of internal forwards based on a fixed category or product path (using a filter). It doesn't really fix it, it just works around it - It

Re: Proposal: URL-Generation Changes

2013-02-09 Thread Hans Bakker
Paul please study it more it is extremely flexible, multi-language and is making full use of the content component... But sure it you know better , improve it! Regards, Hans On 02/09/2013 06:33 PM, Paul Piper wrote: That also doesn't capture it. Here's just a few reasons why: - The current

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-3972) user of tenant generate errors on entity Server_Hit

2013-02-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3972. -- Resolution: Duplicate Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Since 5.6 is officially released this is

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-1148) Bug when it register the visit in the tables with mysql 5

2013-02-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575170#comment-13575170 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1148: This was closed as a duplicate of

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-4934) Ignore tenant data files if the multitenant property is N

2013-02-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4934. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Thanks Chatree, Your patch is in trunk at