The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk-ARM while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-ARM/builds/807
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cal-2_ubuntu_ARM
Build Reason: scheduler
First of all, let me say that it is good to reflect on the roadmap again.
This should be done at regular intervals.
Secondly, I feel that this thread should have been initiated in the other
mailing list. Though many may follow this mailing list, not all do.
Discussions regarding vision and roadmap
In addition, I would like to see the completed items removed.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 1/5/2014 8:35 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
As for the topics in the roadmap document referenced
It looks like you left some debugging code in this change.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 1/5/2014 8:54 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sun Jan 5 13:54:39 2014
New Revision: 106
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r106
Log:
Adds a line between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13862559#comment-13862559
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-680 at 1/5/14 1:58 PM:
I will come back to community on this topic.
Anil Patel
HotWax Media
On Jan 5, 2014, at 9:00 AM, Jacques Le Roux (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
Yes, thanks spotted it few seconds after commit :)
Unfortunately adding this line is not enough for Aptana js editor to separate
comments, well not a big deal...
Jacques
On Sunday, January 05, 2014 2:56 PM adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote
It looks like you left some debugging code in
So now we format code to suit a particular editor? Are we going to move
the comments in all JS functions, or only the ones that don't look right
in your editor?
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 1/5/2014 9:31 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sun
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk-ARM while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-ARM/builds/808
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cal-2_ubuntu_ARM
Build Reason: scheduler
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk-ARM while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-ARM/builds/809
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cal-2_ubuntu_ARM
Build Reason: scheduler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13862605#comment-13862605
]
Anil K Patel commented on OFBIZ-680:
I will come back on this topic.
Anil Patel
Heartily agreed. At Brainfood we also feel it is a better strategy to integrate
with those systems than to compete with them. That is the direction we have
been moving in with our client development work.
- Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
I have participated in a
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-5459:
--
Summary: We set the party elevation but we don't update it as we
do with latitude and longitude
Key: OFBIZ-5459
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5459
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-5460:
--
Summary: Main task for grouping issues related with elevation in
geo location
Key: OFBIZ-5460
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5460
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3198:
---
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Sub-task)
Parent: (was: OFBIZ-1923)
Because of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3198:
---
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement)
Parent: OFBIZ-5460
Because of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-5459:
---
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement)
Parent: OFBIZ-5460
We set the party
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13862653#comment-13862653
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3198:
Why is the many relationship needed? When will a
18 matches
Mail list logo
