Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Anahita Goljahani
+1 Successfully tested both automated and manual tests. Kind regards Anahita 2014-06-09 16:09 GMT+02:00 Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com: This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 12.04 branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 12.04.03 (major

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 Jacopo On Jun 9, 2014, at 4:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 12.04 branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 12.04.03 (major release number: 12.04; minor release number: 03), will supersede

[VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Congratulations, this vote has passed with the following results: [+1] 7 [-1] 0 The minimum (3) number of +1 votes from PMC members has been reached with 5 votes from Jacques, Scott, Ashish, Anil, Jacopo I will proceed with the remaining steps required to release the package. Jacopo On Jun

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5658) checkExistsImage method in ImageManagementServices

2014-06-16 Thread chunlinyao (JIRA)
chunlinyao created OFBIZ-5658: - Summary: checkExistsImage method in ImageManagementServices Key: OFBIZ-5658 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5658 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5578) Quick Ship Entire Order Never Shipping

2014-06-16 Thread Darrell Donati (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14032505#comment-14032505 ] Darrell Donati commented on OFBIZ-5578: --- Hi Jacques, Thanks for reviewing my

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Ron Wheeler
-1 Given the errors in the wiki documentation and the lack of on-line help, it is hard to see how this could be considered tested (try to install it using the docs for a recommended production database and you can see it is not possible that it passed manual tests unless the test suite is

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Adrian Crum
This is a maintenance release, so it includes any documentation that existed when the release branch was created. If you would like to see more documentation included in the trunk, then feel free to submit patches to Jira. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Ron Wheeler
And where would I get the facts to include in the documentation? Is there a secret place where the people writing code write down what the user is supposed to do with the code (use cases)? The copy of the distribution that I downloaded did not even include a draft Release Note. Does the PMC

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Adrian Crum
Keep in mind that this is an all volunteer, open source project. Therefore, there is no industry standard. Those who have contributed documentation in the past learned by using the software and asking questions on the user mailing list. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Ron Wheeler
On 16/06/2014 1:46 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: Keep in mind that this is an all volunteer, open source project. Therefore, there is no industry standard. Does the same assumption apply that volunteers can not write code that meets industry standards for quality or functionality just because they

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Adrian Crum
I'm confused. Are you asking for guidance to improve the project, or are you simply ranting because the project doesn't measure up to your standards? Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 6/16/2014 11:13 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote: On 16/06/2014 1:46 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Pierre Smits
Adrian, Why don't you, as a representative of the PMC, start with trying to answer the questions one by one? So that Ron and other community members can indeed improve documentation regarding the various aspects of the product Regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Ron Wheeler
A bit of both. There were some encouraging words written in earlier exchanges about documentation but a release just got approved with no comments or questions about documentation. I had high hopes that OfBiz would be a more polished product that was ready for use. I am disappointed in the

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Adrian Crum
I answered the questions. Why don't you take some time and actually read my replies? Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 6/16/2014 1:20 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: Adrian, Why don't you, as a representative of the PMC, start with trying to answer the questions one by

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Adrian Crum
Your evaluation of the UI is correct. It is very generic and it is intended to demonstrate the data model and services. That is intentional. Every business is different, so a typical deployment will consist of a custom UI tailored for the target business. So, you are correct that most members

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03

2014-06-16 Thread Pierre Smits
Adrian, My apologies, but I must have missed your answer to the question stated below. Is it possible for the PMC to set some targets for a target level of documentation so that there is a baseline set of JIRA issues on which the PMC agrees? Regard, Pierre Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad Op 16