Jacques,
unfortunately I just discovered (after several hours of testing) that you did
the upgrade incorrectly! This is a pain and I will have to cancel the vote for
the 12.04.04 release.
After the upgrade the tomcat logs are no more processed by log4j; it took me a
long time to figure out what
I am cancelling this vote because the latest upgrade of Tomcat was done
incorrectly.
A new vote will start soon.
Jacopo
On Aug 4, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
> This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the release12.04
> branch. This new release, "Apache O
Thanks Jacopo,
What is the difference?
Jacques
Le 08/08/2014 09:49, jaco...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Aug 8 07:49:45 2014
New Revision: 1616684
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1616684
Log:
Fix for the wrong jar committed by Jacques in rev. 1615296; this one is
actually from
Le 08/08/2014 11:02, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Thanks Jacopo,
What is the difference?
And why it's then prefixed by extras?
Jacques
Le 08/08/2014 09:49, jaco...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Aug 8 07:49:45 2014
New Revision: 1616684
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1616684
L
Ha OK, I asked for it in another email because I understood the opposite in you
commit comment
Maybe we should rather place them in another extras sub-folder with a README to
make things more clear and prevent this kind of error in the future?
Sorry for that :/
Jacques
Le 08/08/2014 09:47, Ja
I think that the current position is ok and the prefixes should be enough to
warn the committers.
The full explanation is here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/logging.html#Using_Log4j
Jacopo
On Aug 8, 2014, at 11:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Ha OK, I asked for it in another email
On Aug 8, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> And why it's then prefixed by extras?
If you didn't know the answer, why did you add the prefix? :-)
Jacopo
I already updated Tomcat without this error. But I must say I never checked why there were extras jars. I just copied them by analogy. This time I
was not focused enough and copied the wrong one 1st and did not spot it in extras zip after.
Lessons learned
Jacques
Le 08/08/2014 11:19, Jacopo C
Pierre Smits created OFBIZ-5704:
---
Summary: Extend lot entity to include party Id of manufacturer
Key: OFBIZ-5704
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5704
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-5704:
Component/s: workeffort
manufacturing
> Extend lot entity to include party Id of m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14090576#comment-14090576
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5704:
-
This affects forms and screens (both xml and ft
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-5704:
Attachment: OFBiz-5704-Product-EntityModel-Lot.patch
This patch improves the Lot entity.
> Extend
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14090664#comment-14090664
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-5704:
I recommend we follow the party role pattern and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14090697#comment-14090697
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-5704 at 8/8/14 12:16 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14090697#comment-14090697
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5704:
+1 for Adrian suggestion
> Extend lot en
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-5702:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 12.04.05)
12.04.04
> Wrong timeFormat of date
This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the release12.04
branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 12.04.04" will supersede all the
previous releases from the same branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
and are:
*
That would be great.
Would anyone on the PMC object to us having a go at this?
Does anyone have any strongly held beliefs about this section that they
want to convey before we start?
Ron
On 08/08/2014 11:21 AM, Sharan-F wrote:
Hi Ron
I'm not PMC but I'm interested in tidy up the OFBiz docum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14091356#comment-14091356
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5704:
-
I recommend that we do not make it more complic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14091356#comment-14091356
]
Pierre Smits edited comment on OFBIZ-5704 at 8/8/14 10:51 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14091623#comment-14091623
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-5704:
I do not agree that lots will never have more tha
On 08/08/2014 5:54 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Ron,
You do have a point with respect of OFBiz adoption by new (and/or
prospective) users, and you outline it very well. And you already started
addressing in (an)other mail thread(s). And it found fruitful ground
there. Please keep up the good work, a
Thank you for the initiative!
My only suggestion is to consider the idea of merging the content from this
Confluence space into the main Confluence space (wiki); having one space to
maintain will be easier.
Jacopo
On Aug 8, 2014, at 9:17 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> That would be great.
> Would
23 matches
Mail list logo
