[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14267460#comment-14267460
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5767:
Without answer in few days I will revert.
I think we need to make a decision about this. Let me summarize the
alternatives I proposed:
1. Put the state of the specialpurpose components in trunk when the branch was freezed r1505933 and then add the bug fixes since
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12329808
2. let the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14267453#comment-14267453
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5905:
Other releases too complicated, or?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14267395#comment-14267395
]
Nicolas Malin commented on OFBIZ-5905:
--
I fixed it also on branch 14.12 under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin updated OFBIZ-5905:
-
Fix Version/s: 14.12.01
Change createPartyRelationshipAndRole to use ensurePartyRole
On Jan 7, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Nobody like the 2nd alternative it seems.
?
Jacopo
Forrest Rae created OFBIZ-5950:
--
Summary: addOrderShipmentToShipment Should Return shipmentItemSeqId
Key: OFBIZ-5950
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5950
Project: OFBiz
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Forrest Rae updated OFBIZ-5950:
---
Attachment: addOrderShipmentToShipment-return-shipmentItemSeqId.patch
addOrderShipmentToShipment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-5947.
--
Resolution: Not a Problem
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
At the moment those methods (w/
So you prefer R13.01 w/ only the ecommerce component in specialpurpose, why?
Jacques
Le 07/01/2015 20:32, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
I would say no if that is the only question being asked.
We can have the discussion about how to support individual modules later if you
want to do it in 2 steps.
Currently the links for the backends demos on the main site page use
?USERNAME=flexadminPASSWORD=ofbizJavaScriptEnabled=Y
Someone suggested we rather use
?USERNAME=adminPASSWORD=ofbizJavaScriptEnabled=Y
If there is no opposition I will do so (I can't remember clearly why I picked
flexadmin
Le 07/01/2015 12:47, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Jan 7, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Nobody like the 2nd alternative it seems.
?
It's obvious we (the OFBIz community) are missing some components in
specialpurpose. Maybe not all...
A fact
So everyone is happy with an external tool when we have an internal dedicated
tool for that?
Jacques
Le 19/12/2014 22:00, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Why not rather using Gliffy that we have available in Confluence
http://www.gliffy.com/user-manual/?productId=1 ?
Jacques
Le 18/12/2014 14:53,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14268314#comment-14268314
]
Nicolas Malin commented on OFBIZ-5393:
--
Hello Christian
Your patch is a few old so
Wai created OFBIZ-5949:
--
Summary: Remove generation of temp file when loading entity xml
file containing placeholders
Key: OFBIZ-5949
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5949
Project: OFBiz
I think we can remove this page
Jacques
Le 26/11/2014 15:12, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Open+Standards+for+OFBiz
This page appears to be old and probably in need of update.
Some of the sentences using the future tense should be changed to say
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14268338#comment-14268338
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5947:
-
This is not about cloneWorkEffortCostCalcs.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14268290#comment-14268290
]
Nicolas Malin commented on OFBIZ-5746:
--
Hello Julien,
Your prosition works well on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14268344#comment-14268344
]
Wai commented on OFBIZ-5949:
Could someone help out?
For this patch to work properly, I had
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14268367#comment-14268367
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5947:
cloneWorkEffortPartyAssignments and
It will move the project forward towards more community involvement if
the core and framework get the attention that they need and the non-core
modules are free to attract their own following and start to have
independent lives with independent roadmaps, release schedules and
communities
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14268285#comment-14268285
]
Nicolas Malin commented on OFBIZ-5924:
--
No pb Ejaz,
As said your contribution is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wai updated OFBIZ-5949:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-5949.patch
Remove generation of temp file when loading entity xml file containing
placeholders
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14268381#comment-14268381
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5947:
-
What way?
Move
On Jan 7, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Do you think you represent the OFBiz community ?
I don't, in fact I am just expressing my own opinion: there are people that
agree with me and people that do not agree with me.
You should do the same instead of
This is the kind of discussion that I am hoping to avoid with option 4.
Let the community decide and show their choice by a willingness to
support the components that the OFBiz Community wants to keep.
If a component does not need enhancement and can run as is in 13.x.x or
there is no one
Le 07/01/2015 16:59, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Jan 7, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Le 07/01/2015 12:47, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Jan 7, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Nobody like the 2nd
The raw question is should we put back the specialpurpose components back in R13.07
or not?
It's not planning something new here, just cleaning our mess!
Jacques
Le 07/01/2015 17:28, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
This is the kind of discussion that I am hoping to avoid with option 4.
Let the
I would say no if that is the only question being asked.
We can have the discussion about how to support individual modules later
if you want to do it in 2 steps.
Ron
On 07/01/2015 11:43 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
The raw question is should we put back the specialpurpose components
back in
4) Cut the special purpose loose and let interested parties set up
sub-projects to work on them and release versions of individual special
purpose projects as required to support new releases of the trunk.
Focus on getting the core and framework into a stable well documented
product with:
- a
On Jan 7, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Le 07/01/2015 12:47, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Jan 7, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Nobody like the 2nd alternative it seems.
?
It's obvious we (the OFBIz
Done
Jacques
Le 18/11/2014 14:56, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Since Scott and recently Sharan copied/updated the site pages
http://ofbiz.apache.org/docs/entity.html
http://ofbiz.apache.org/docs/entityconfig.html
http://ofbiz.apache.org/docs/services.html
Ha OK, I see, I was biased indeed. I still believe we miss them :p
Jacques
Le 07/01/2015 17:55, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Jan 7, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Do you think you represent the OFBiz community ?
I don't, in fact I am just
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8990
Jacques
34 matches
Mail list logo
