Hi Jacques
Le 11/02/2016 23:10, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 11/02/2016 22:27, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Nicolas, All,
I globally like the changes, I just have a question.
With these changes the OrderSecurityError* properties which were used
here are now useless, should we not remove
Le 11/02/2016 22:51, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
* else check if a field like %statusId is present on IN service
fields and isn't a pk -> check the related cancel status (if
possible to resolve it by the StatusType)
This seems more normalised, I though found a fromStatusId in
Thanks for the reminder,
A) -1
B) +0
C) +1
Gil
On 11/02/2016 22:26, Nicolas Malin wrote:
A) 0
B) 0
C) +1
Remind, 2 days before closure for the stragglers :)
Nicolas
Le 30/01/2016 06:52, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
A) -1
B) 0
C) +1
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwaxsystems.com
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15142515#comment-15142515
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6568:
--
I am still working on a slightly cleaner solution for
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/411
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler
Hi,
FYI: I have created a working BuildBot builder for the branch 15.12.
Jacques
BTW, please use rather user ML for such questions, see why here
http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
You will get a better support and it's more fair to share with everybody
The wider the audience the better the answers you might get
Thanks
Jacques
Le 10/02/2016 12:04,
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk-rat while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-rat/builds/241
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler
If you did not find it yet, have a look at
/framework/catalina/ofbiz-component.xml
But please, use rather user ML for such questions, see why here
http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
You will get a better support and it's more fair to share with everybody
The wider the audience the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-6568.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Update Groovy to 2.4.5 version
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15142708#comment-15142708
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-6568:
--
Improved the code at revisions:
trunk: r1729809
Hi Nicolas, All,
I globally like the changes, I just have a question.
With these changes the OrderSecurityError* properties which were used here are
now useless, should we not remove them?
Despite the lost, I think it's reasonable because these errors have very few chances to appear, and if
A) 0
B) 0
C) +1
Remind, 2 days before closure for the stragglers :)
Nicolas
Le 30/01/2016 06:52, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
A) -1
B) 0
C) +1
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwaxsystems.com
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
A) -1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin reassigned OFBIZ-6892:
Assignee: Nicolas Malin
> new action expire for service engine entity-auto
>
Nicolas Malin created OFBIZ-6892:
Summary: new action expire for service engine entity-auto
Key: OFBIZ-6892
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6892
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type:
Patch available here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6892
Nicolas
Le 11/02/2016 17:06, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Ok expire have the most consensus :) so I will do the improvement with
it.
To ensure that the new action will don't create any doubt I will
exclude the status case to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15143570#comment-15143570
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6854:
Before closing we might consider removing the
Le 11/02/2016 22:27, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Nicolas, All,
I globally like the changes, I just have a question.
With these changes the OrderSecurityError* properties which were used here are
now useless, should we not remove them?
Despite the lost, I think it's reasonable because these
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15143592#comment-15143592
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6854:
Oops, I did not see the elephant in the room: they are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin updated OFBIZ-6892:
-
Description:
Relate to the thread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15143585#comment-15143585
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6854:
If we agree, we should apply the same idea each time it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin updated OFBIZ-6892:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-6892.patch
> new action expire for service engine entity-auto
>
Le 11/02/2016 17:40, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
In line
The idea, when you call cancel :
* check if a field date is present on IN service fields and isn't a pk -> set
at now
What do you mean exactly by a "field date", how do you discern between estimatedStartDate and estimatedCompletionDate
A) -1
B) +0
C) +1
Regards,
Michael
Am 29.01.16 um 10:22 schrieb Nicolas Malin:
Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need
to help him to ensure that
I like this idea very much, +1!
Am 04.02.16 um 09:53 schrieb Sharan-F:
Hi Everyone
Looking at our tentative release schedule we have said that this month we
would look at releasing 14.12.01. It has been maturing for over a year so
are we ready to begin preparing for its release this month ?
In line
The idea, when you call cancel :
* check if a field date is present on IN service fields and isn't a
pk -> set at now
What do you mean exactly by a "field date", how do you discern between
estimatedStartDate and estimatedCompletionDate (of course only the
last should be set to now)
Ok expire have the most consensus :) so I will do the improvement with it.
To ensure that the new action will don't create any doubt I will exclude
the status case to manage only expiration date cases.
Thanks all for your comments !
Nicolas
Le 08/02/2016 05:51, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15142492#comment-15142492
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6891:
Abhinav
Please use rather user ML for such questions,
28 matches
Mail list logo
