A) 0
B) 0
C) +1
Remind, 2 days before closure for the stragglers :)
Nicolas
Le 30/01/2016 06:52, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
A) -1
B) 0
C) +1
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwaxsystems.com
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
A) -1
B) +0
C) +1 (as I said at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?focusedCommentId=15110699
we need to keep the Java package name way to avoid file names collisions
when using the "component://" notation (in screens)
Jacques
Le 29/01/2016 10:22, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need to
help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and that he
won't waste his time.
Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang files
but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your preference for
the following naming space :
A) All groovy script under the same path src/main/groovy/...
B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/...
(pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts) C)
Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/... (pre-compiled
Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts, groovyScripts rather that
script because other script languages could be used in the future)
D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin Jacopo's
message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi
I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !
Cheers,
Nicolas
