Re: Themes votes results

2016-10-04 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
Thank you Scott, I summarize voting threads (binding votes only). If someone is willing to cross check I'd appreciate it. The vote results favor removing BlueLight, Bizzness time and Dropping Crumbs. The earlier numbers provided by Jacques were not correct because it includes non-binding votes, ne

Re: [COMMUNITY VOTE RESULT] New OFBiz Logo

2016-10-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
+1 Jacques Le 05/10/2016 à 07:51, Paul Piper a écrit : Perhaps I should add: I liked the work Brainfood had done in the past with the themes, logo & CI it provided. You guys did a good job back then! So I hope that none of you guys take these recent moves as a devaluation of your work. --

Re: [COMMUNITY VOTE RESULT] New OFBiz Logo

2016-10-04 Thread Paul Piper
Perhaps I should add: I liked the work Brainfood had done in the past with the themes, logo & CI it provided. You guys did a good job back then! So I hope that none of you guys take these recent moves as a devaluation of your work. -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabbl

Re: [COMMUNITY VOTE RESULT] New OFBiz Logo

2016-10-04 Thread Paul Piper
Ean, thanks for the link. I fully agree. Though I don't feel strongly about the logo myself, It just struck me as odd that two out of the three options the community was shown were representing the then current design and the last was representing the one that came before. Neither option was true

Re: Themes votes results

2016-10-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 04/10/2016 à 22:09, Paul Foxworthy a écrit : On 4 October 2016 at 23:05, Jacques Le Roux wrote: But the idea is to keep only 1 or 2 themes. I'd suggest that a policy to limit themes to one or two is a separate issue. It's a change to the state of OFBiz at present. If anyone wants to advo

Re: Themes votes results

2016-10-04 Thread Paul Foxworthy
On 4 October 2016 at 23:05, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > But the idea is to keep only 1 or 2 themes. > I'd suggest that a policy to limit themes to one or two is a separate issue. It's a change to the state of OFBiz at present. If anyone wants to advocate that, it should probably be voted on in its

Re: Themes votes results

2016-10-04 Thread Scott Gray
Before taking any action I'd prefer to see a proper tally of binding and non-binding votes sent to each vote thread. Regards Scott On 4/10/2016 9:55 PM, "Taher Alkhateeb" wrote: > Wow! You start 9 votes in 9 threads; you engage the entire community and > now that the votes are out and finished

Re: [COMMUNITY VOTE RESULT] New OFBiz Logo

2016-10-04 Thread Ean Schuessler
This is one of the benefits of the Condorcet style voting that Debian uses. Both option 1 and option 2 would probably have defeated option 3 in an straight contest between the two contestants. A jaded person might speculate that the vote seems constructed to favor the third logo but I have a feelin

Re: Themes votes results

2016-10-04 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
Wow! You start 9 votes in 9 threads; you engage the entire community and now that the votes are out and finished you want to cancel it? And the reason is "too much burden"? Here is the burden: 1) delete three folders representing the themes approved for deletion. 2) svn commit If you feel this is

Re: Themes votes results

2016-10-04 Thread Michael Brohl
Jacques, For example if you look at the vote for Tomahawk, 5 people voted against removing and only 3 to remove it, so to me that vote result means keep it. Yes we could keep it. I'm all for that, it's my preferred, hint: I'm daltonian. But the idea is to keep only 1 or 2 themes. For me, tha

Re: Themes votes results

2016-10-04 Thread Michael Brohl
Hi Jacques, I think you cannot decide for yourself to cancel a vote which is already finished. This would make the whole voting process farcical. You should at least ask the community if it is ok to cancel the vote and take no action. Besides this, I don't see a reason to cancel it. What's

Re: Themes votes results

2016-10-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi All, I have decided to cancel these votes because it's too much a burden for me. They will not be actioned. I'm very sorry for this decision, and I thank all of you who take care of voting. Unfortunately I think I did not explain myself well enough. So I prefer not to continue to manage t

Re: Themes votes results

2016-10-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Taher, Le 01/10/2016 à 19:24, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Who says there are 2 themes to keep with best scores? How did you come up with this arrangement? https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/db3697483813775a288f48409f4b3db7a05b51ee50b042816762bd9a@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E The votes were

Re: Themes votes results

2016-10-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Michael, Le 01/10/2016 à 21:53, Michael Brohl a écrit : Jacques, as far as I understand the theme voting, the community decided to keep all themes with negative votes and drop the ones with positive votes. I fully agree with Sharan's and Taher's opinions. If you had another ruleset for t

Re: Themes votes results

2016-10-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
HI Sharan, Le 01/10/2016 à 19:18, Sharan Foga a écrit : Hi Jacques I'm a little confused. You ran 9 different individual votes so there shouldn't there 9 different vote results as to whether to keep each theme or not. Yes, I put the 9 votes below in a new thread. I thought it would make thi