Re: [DISCUSSION] Improving the OFBiz User Interface

IMO instead of thinking to support different UI framework we can define our standard html and then write css based on it. If anyone want to plug different UI framework then user can create new template file and and set it in widget.properties. Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit

Re: [DISCUSSION] Improving the OFBiz User Interface

These are good news, Nicolas :-) I started to review your efforts on common-theme but might not have digged deep enough to notice the separation layer (there are many changes already). I thought that it just moved the base theme and images stuff out of the framework. I really appreciate

Re: [DISCUSSION] Improving the OFBiz User Interface

Michael the separation layer between html/css/js lib and the model screen is already done on the common-theme present on my github repo (1) without break older theme. This it's the easier face on the problem, because the hidden face is present with elements who use macro without ui rendering

Re: [DISCUSSION] Improving the OFBiz User Interface

I'm currently twisting my had around the question of theme compatibility. The current theme set and the html code (freemarker templates and the code produced by forms and widgets) correspond with each other (naturally). So if we want to introduce a new CSS framework like Bootstrap, we will

Re: [PROPOSAL] Environment variable configuration

I faced something similar in the past (Not related to OFBiz). Many systems require different paths of configuration depending on different deployment scenarios. There are multiple types of configurations I can think of including: - platform dependent configurations (it depends on your server and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Environment variable configuration

Hi Gil, we have similar challenges and modified OFBiz to deal with it easily. We offered to contribute this long time ago (2008) but it was decided against [1]. It was suggested to use patches instead but I think it's too complicated to manage several patch sets for different environments.

[PROPOSAL] Environment variable configuration

Hello all, Working with different hosting companies, we used to have issues when deploying OFBiz concerning technical configuration of the different environments. We are writing this mail to get feedback from the community and eventually propose to improve OFBiz on this matter. For a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Improving the OFBiz User Interface

Hi Michael, I agreed it will be going too far if we adopt JSF. Maybe better value to spend on improving what OFBiz already have. Regards, James Yong On 2017/07/04 14:57:33, Michael Brohl wrote: > Hi James, > > thanks for your suggestions. > > As far as I know, JSF

Re: [DISCUSSION] Improving the OFBiz User Interface

Ah, thanks for the pointer, Jacques. I forgot about this and will have a look at the work Nicolas did there so far. Regards, Michael Am 05.07.17 um 14:09 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: That makes sense Taher and was already discussed and mostly agreed IIRW. There is even a Jira for that

buildbot success in on ofbiz-branch16

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-branch16 while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch16/builds/78 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler

Re: [DISCUSSION] Improving the OFBiz User Interface

That makes sense Taher and was already discussed and mostly agreed IIRW. There is even a Jira for that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5776 Jacques Le 05/07/2017 à 13:40, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Hi Michael, My suggestion (other opinions might enrich the discussion) is to limit

buildbot exception in on ofbiz-trunk-framework

The Buildbot has detected a build exception on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework/builds/250 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: orcus_ubuntu Build Reason: The

Re: [DISCUSSION] Improving the OFBiz User Interface

Hi Michael, My suggestion (other opinions might enrich the discussion) is to limit current work to moving actual web items (html, css, javascript, images and so on). Moving ftl might be too much work and perhaps widgets should stay where they are. What I suggest moving is things that live in the

Re: [DISCUSSION] Improving the OFBiz User Interface

Hi Taher, do I understand you correctly that you want to move all screen definitions and the ftl template files (containing the html) to a central component outside the framework/applications? Regards, Michael Am 04.07.17 um 23:50 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb: Hi Michael, I think we agree,