Re: [Proposal] Extend facility entity

Hello all, Sorry for late reply as I was out of town. Thank you very much to all of you for sharing this valuable information. As we can conclude this conversation here. I will create a new entity facilityCalendar which will create the one-to-many relationship between facility and calendar.

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

+1 to using Flat Grey theme as the default for the upcoming release for the reason given by Jacques Was trying out on Visual Theme selection. Saw some rough edges on the OFBiz logo for Tomahawk & Flat Grey themes. Actual OFBiz logo seen in the application for Tomahawk & Flat Grey themes

Re: OFBiz Version Info

+1 to having VERSION file at project root to store released version. On 2017-11-29 16:10, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Le 29/11/2017 à 07:57, Michael Brohl a écrit : > > -1 for storing the version in .properties. > +1 > > > > > +1 for using a VERSION or RELEASE

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

Should we keep Tomahawk as the default in trunk or change before freezing for R17.12? We know Tomahawk does not support RTL languages and we have a such users base using demos (I see it every time I use demos). There is still work to do for Rainbow[1], so maybe the old Flat Grey? Jacques [1]

Re: Erwan de FERRIERES inactive?

Thanks Erwan, Your answer is much appreciated :) BTW, I guess you still want to be a PMC or do you want to resign from this function as well? Jacques Le 30/11/2017 à 15:28, Erwan de FERRIERES a écrit : Hi Jacques, thanks for your concern. Yes, please add me to the inactive section !

Re: [DISCUSSION] migrate mini lang to Java and/or groovy

Le 30/11/2017 à 15:33, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Also, even if it's out of subject and for a long term (how long?) future, I'm still worried about Groovy future (starting with Java 9 and after)... I hope we will not find ourselves having to migrate services from Groovy after having done the

Re: [DISCUSSION] migrate mini lang to Java and/or groovy

Hi All, I'm maybe too cautious here, but I was thinking about Michael's "some core principles on how we want to use it" again. So I reviewed what we have done so far (sub-tasks of OFBIZ-9350). Fortunately I think we are mostly doing good :) I though still believe that we should pay more

Re: Erwan de FERRIERES inactive?

Hi Jacques, thanks for your concern. Yes, please add me to the inactive section ! Regards, Le lun. 27 nov. 2017 à 10:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > Le 24/11/2017 à 10:17, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > Hi Erwan, > > > > I was wondering if you are still interested

Re: All roleType entities should maintain lifespan

Nothing was added for almost 2 weeks. So I think we reached a lazy consensus, let me summarise it here, as I see it: 1. We don't want to add lifespan (add from/thruDate fields) to roleType entities; so OFBIZ-5959, its subtasks and related tasks should be closed as won't fix 2. We want