Hello Suraj,
Currently I see no possibility to override an eca because definitions
are all loaded and we can have exactly two identical definition with
different action. In this case difficult to spot the eca to disable/improve.
So before try to override an eca I suggest to implement an
iden
Hi,
How, is it possible, to access the online help in Rainbow themes?
Thanks
Jacques
Hi,
Almost 6 years ago OFBIZ-4959 "Logout do not remove autoLogin" was created and
I closed as incomplete.
Recently while working on OFBIZ-10206 "Security issue in Token Based Authentication" which followed my work in OFBIZ-9833 "Token Based Authentication"
I needed a way to get the userLoginI
Le 10/02/2018 à 12:33, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Almost 6 years ago OFBIZ-4959 "Logout do not remove autoLogin" was created and
I closed as incomplete.
Recently while working on OFBIZ-10206 "Security issue in Token Based Authentication" which followed my work in OFBIZ-9833 "Token Based
Au
Hi Nicolas,
I think there is a confusion here.
I am trying to find the reason why condition-service have not been
implemented for ecas?
I there is no such reason, I propose we should have a similar concept for
ecas as well.
So that we can write something like:
Suraj/Nicolas,
IMO, There is no need to extend/override an ECA rule. ECA like we want to
trigger something conditionally and it happens once we establish the rule.
We can change the rule, and we are doing that frequently as per our custom
requirement and we have calls to disable sometimes when req