Re: [DISCUSSION] Fix or remove CompDoc funtionality of the content manager

+1 to remove the functionality because it is a very old contribution that has been left incomplete for several years without much interest from community members. Jacopo On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:45 PM Michael Brohl wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to drag your attention to the Jira issue Dennis

Re: [DISCUSSION] Fix or remove CompDoc funtionality of the content manager

+1 we can remove CompDoc functionality from the code base Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:55 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Based on https://markmail.org/message/4e4baunevgksv3bo I'd say that if > nobody wants to work on it it's

Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files

The question is quite simple. It's about always using or not the /if (Debug.levelOn()) {/ expression for the info and debug level as suggests Michael. Or only using /if/ /(Debug.verboseOn()) { /expression as I recommend for the reasons explained. I think we all agree the /if/

Re: [DISCUSSION] Fix or remove CompDoc funtionality of the content manager

Based on https://markmail.org/message/4e4baunevgksv3bo I'd say that if nobody wants to work on it it's better to get rid of it BTW IIRW the purpose of *CompDoc* was to create specific composite documents based on "primitive" content types. Jacques Le 08/12/2018 à 20:09, Taher Alkhateeb a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files

I didn't understand the exact decision required? To do what vs what? On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:43 PM Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > Hi, > > After OFBIZ-10052, OFBIZ-10448, and OFBIZ-10697 I think it's time to have > another discussion following https://markmail.org/message/mplvusuqn7oshl4v > which

Re: [QUESTION] What about TypeScript?

Try it where? How? On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:41 PM Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > Hi, > > I was reading https://www.thoughtworks.com/radar/languages-and-frameworks, > for a long time I'm interested by TypeScript. This is what they say: > > ** is a carefully >

[DISCUSSION] Checking debug levels in Java and Groovy files

Hi, After OFBIZ-10052, OFBIZ-10448, and OFBIZ-10697 I think it's time to have another discussion following https://markmail.org/message/mplvusuqn7oshl4v which was one year ago. In OFBIZ-10697 I wrote: : I'd be all for removing the

[QUESTION] What about TypeScript?

Hi, I was reading https://www.thoughtworks.com/radar/languages-and-frameworks, for a long time I'm interested by TypeScript. This is what they say: ** is a carefully considered language and its consistently improving tools and IDE support continues to