Re: [QUESTION] Has anyone worked with vue.js and ofbiz?

2019-08-18 Thread Shi Jinghai
Hi Hannes, I think I understand your feeling as I tried BlazeDS in 2007/2008 and Angular at the same time as you did. I have changed to Vue for a year. I'm very happy on it as both development quality and speed are great. I'm sure the front end container is mature and steady now, new

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.06

2019-08-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 18/08/2019 à 15:20, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:48 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: Le 18/08/2019 à 08:51, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : We could either add some notes about it to the README or consider the Bintray approach introduced by

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.06

2019-08-18 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:48 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Le 18/08/2019 à 08:51, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > > We could either add some notes about it to the README or consider the > > > > Bintray approach introduced by Nicolas also for this release branch. > > >

[QUESTION] Has anyone worked with vue.js and ofbiz?

2019-08-18 Thread Hannes Geist
Hi Everyone, i have developed an AngularJS 1.7.x frontend with Foundation 6.x, angular-foundation, ag-grid, jqx-grid and ngDialog based on ofbiz 16.x for a customer for 2,5 years now. It works pretty well, although one can see AngularJs 1.x weaknesses when you have to display large amounts of

Re: [QUESTION] What about TypeScript?

2019-08-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Taher, This Winter I began a try. But it was more complicated than I thought. I worked on OfbizUtil.ts (from OfbizUtil.js). I keep the work for now (was considering dropping it, but it's not a problem to keep it) Jacques Le 10/12/2018 à 17:56, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Try it where?

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.06

2019-08-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Jacopo, Inline... Le 18/08/2019 à 08:51, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : We could either add some notes about it to the README or consider the Bintray approach introduced by Nicolas also for this release branch. The Bintray approach sounds fine with me. We then need to update the README.md

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.06

2019-08-18 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 5:32 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > [...] > Maybe we should better have DEFAULT_JVM_OPTS="" in both Gradle files? Did > not try... > This worked for me but I couldn't find a way to instruct Gradle to generate the wrapper files in this way.

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.06

2019-08-18 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:34 PM Michael Brohl wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > it seems that you have used a different format for the > apache-ofbiz-16.11.06.zip.sha512 file than in other releases. > > This breaks the automatic signature check of the script in > ofbiz-tools/verify-ofbiz-release.sh > >