Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.06 - Second attempt

2021-06-17 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > So as suggested Jacopo (not sure you got a copy), we can remove the mention > in LICENSE file. I'll do so right now… Yes that sounds like the right thing to do to me. Either way it not an issue for this release, having extra info in a license file is just a documentation issue. Kind

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.06 - Second attempt

2021-06-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I did not find any such files. Good to hear and I'm sure you're right, as I said I'm not familiar with your codebase. These directories are the ones I noticed: ./plugins/birt/widget/birt ./plugins/birt/webapp/birt ./plugins/birt/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/birt Kind Regards, Justin

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.06 - Second attempt

2021-06-16 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I could see the some of the files in question covered by that license in your source release so I'm not 100% sure that is correct, but I'm not familiar with your code base. You might want to double check just to be sure. If it not in the source release then there no need to mention that

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.06 - Second attempt

2021-06-16 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, I'm not on your PMC but I noticed something a little odd with this release . Your LICENSE states: This product bundles files from the "Birt" technology platform (www.eclipse.org/birt/) which are available under the "Eclipse Public License - v 1.0". For details, see