Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Samuel Trégouët
> I think you cannot make the tool responsible for how it is used in this > particular case. of course the tool is responsible! Jira is not a tool to review code! "Jira: Issue & Project Tracking Software" so nothing to do with code ;) Just imagine how it would be possible with another tool.

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Samuel Trégouët
Hi Michael, > > To justify the need of making a change, to me the question is quite the > opposite: what does GitHub offer which Jira does not in the domain of > contributing/ project management/ issue tracking? Jira review process is awfull! I tried to review OFBIZ-11306 and give up after 3

Re: What is OFBiz public API?

2020-01-06 Thread Samuel Trégouët
Hi all, > Am 05.01.20 um 18:32 schrieb Mathieu Lirzin: > > > > I urge other contributors to join this discussion which is crucial to > > define our capability to work together as a community and my willing to > > continue to participate. I also hope others contributors will eventually join (many

Re: Removing “base/config/component-load.xml”

2019-12-18 Thread Samuel Trégouët
Hi all, Quoting Jacques Le Roux (2019-12-18 12:39:56) > OK, I sent this message before seeing Mathieu's last one. I guess the revert > Mathieu should close this discussion. I suggest to create a new one about > feature forking (please stop this one). feature forking is another discussion =>

Re: Github PRs and Jira

2019-12-09 Thread Samuel Trégouët
Hi all, I see another point to consider on our workflow: running continuous integration (checkstyle, compilation, unit test, integration test, sonar) on every code submission (I mean before commiting on trunk!) It seems to me that is not really complicated with github/gitlab pull requests. But I

Re: question about ServiceHandler.checkSecureParameter

2019-12-09 Thread Samuel Trégouët
yes there is a need for csrf check on get request ;) I will write details in OFBIZ-11306 [1] Samuel [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11306

Re: question about ServiceHandler.checkSecureParameter

2019-11-27 Thread Samuel Trégouët
Hi James, I still don't see any reason to keep checkSecureParameter in any form because it is related to ServiceEventHandler. Protection against csrf is a good idea but it has no thing to do with Service. It should be done upstream in http request processing so every type of event

Re: Change commit message template?

2019-11-18 Thread Samuel Trégouët
Hi, agree with Mathieu: I prefer keeping issue id in footer (at the end of commit message) so we can save some characters in subject line to express something meaningful. In addition if we put this information in commit footer (or body) we can copy the complete link to issue (for example

Re: question about ServiceHandler.checkSecureParameter

2019-11-07 Thread Samuel Trégouët
Hi James, actually `checkSecureParameter` is only for service event in a request map. So it doesn't mean you are updating server data. Moreover you can also update server data with a java event and in this case `checkSecureParameter` is not called. So in my opinion this protection is very