Hi,
I feel like Michael, when there are 'in progress' work in trunk, when we
create a release branch for stabilisation, the remaining work of such
task will only be in trunk (since those are improvements).
But delaying release is not good when we look at the name of our last
release that show the
Thanks Jacques !
gil
On 28/03/24 10:05, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Without negative answer this week, I'll set the 2.3.33 version on trunk next
> week
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12935
>
> TIA (for your tests see also the patch in OFBIZ-12934)
>
> Jacques
>
Hi Daniel,
I understand your points, and I agree that the level of care to the
framework and plugins repositories are quite not the same as of today.
I dug in mailing list history to get the origin of plugins [1]
Before plugins exists, every components we can find in plugin repo where
present in
Hello everyone,
Some people from Nereide Team are planning to attend the Community Over Code
Europe Event in Bratislava this summer.
We would love to see members of Apache OFBiz community there and would like to
know if any of you are also planning to come.
It would be great to plan something t
Integration tests and signatures ok !
java -version
openjdk version "11.0.22" 2024-01-16
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-11.0.22+7 (build 11.0.22+7)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-11.0.22+7 (build 11.0.22+7, mixed mode)
uname -a
Linux manger 6.1.0-17-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.
+1
Thanks,
Gil
On 13/01/24 08:17, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.12", twelfth
> release from the release18.12 branch.
>
> The release files can be downloaded from here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
> and are:
> * apache-ofbiz
+1,
Thanks !
Gil
On 16/10/23 07:45, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Over the last few months we have been experiencing more frequent restarts
> of the VM used to host our demo sites. This triggers an alert email to a
> few of us and someone has to access the VM to manually restart the demo
>
Hello Jacques,
Yes it could be a good enhancement to control codenarc check when
pushing.
Thanks,
Gil
On 02/08/23 07:42, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have set a Git pre-push hook in order to stop pushes with Checkstyle
> issues.
>
> I propose to do the same for Codenarc.
>
> Current
o let other see
your comments and suggestions.
I'll be glad to answer you as soon as possible :)
Gil
>
> Please could you let me know if my review within PR 517 is visible to you.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan.
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 12:35, gil.portenseigne
> wrot
e comments from the PR in the tracking document.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan.
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 08:18, gil.portenseigne
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Daniel,
> >
> > Thanks again for the review you did, could we add a small description
> > when UNSURE or WOR
have found it yet! I'll play around with
> > Confluence a bit more.
> >
> > But as mentioned before, perhaps I am making too much out of tracking this
> > review.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dan.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2023
Welcome Daniel, and Congrats !
Gil
On 28/01/23 11:57, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> The OFBiz PMC has invited Daniel Watford as a new PMC member and we
> are glad to announce that Daniel has accepted the nomination.
>
> On behalf of the OFBiz PMC, welcome on board!
signature.asc
Description: PGP s
I got to leave, but i generated in confluence a list of check, is that
good enough ?
Gil
On 27/01/23 05:41, gil.portenseigne wrote:
> Hello, indeed, that will generate much spam, i did some before reading
> your answer.
>
> I'll have a look for conluence.
>
> Gil
&g
uence that we could use to track the
> review effort?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan.
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 15:27, gil.portenseigne
> wrote:
>
> > Oops, i did a fixup commit with push force that remove all comments in
> > the pull request... Will not do t
Oops, i did a fixup commit with push force that remove all comments in
the pull request... Will not do that again.
I fixed the detected typo.
gil
On 27/01/23 02:56, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Ah OK, sounds better indeed
>
> Le 27/01/2023 à 14:06, gil.portenseigne a écrit :
> > The
n every file.
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 27/01/2023 à 10:41, gil.portenseigne a écrit :
> > Hi Daniel, Jacques,
> >
> > I wonders the same, the "Review changes" do not seems to concern one
> > file but the whole pull request, there is a r
Hi Daniel, Jacques,
I wonders the same, the "Review changes" do not seems to concern one
file but the whole pull request, there is a review checkbox, but it
seems to be personal, i checked the first one
(AcctgAdminServices.groovy) for testing purpose.
What we could do is to add a comment at the s
Hi,
One concern I have is about pushing codenarc work, should be it part of
23.xx branch ?
I think that could be nice
WDYT ?
Gil
On 24/01/23 10:03, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> How many time do you think we still need before deciding to release 22.01.01
> using JDK 17 and creating t
Hello Devs,
That is with pleasure, that I managed to integrate into OFBiz framework
(no plugins yet) Codenarc, and that the build is successful under java
17.
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/517#issuecomment-1398487745
I tried to isolate rule fixes in separated commits, there are
t;
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 03/01/2023 à 09:34, gil.portenseigne a écrit :
> > Hello Jacques,
> >
> > +1 to release with Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, that'd be great !
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gil
> > On 02/01/23 11:15, Jacques Le
Hello Jacques,
+1 to release with Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, that'd be great !
Thanks,
Gil
On 02/01/23 11:15, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Nicolas, All,
>
> Thanks Nicolas for your opinions. I'm surprised that we are only 5 to express
> opinions about this important decision.
>
> Is nobody else in
21 matches
Mail list logo
