Re: [discussion] With plugins, is hot-deploy necessary?

2017-03-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
(there > are 12 of them). > > On the other hand, Jacques Le Roux takes the position that all plugins > (open > sourced, commercial, in-house prototypes) should all be located in one > place. > > You opinions are greatly appreciated. > > Kind regards, > Wai > > &g

Re: [discussion] With plugins, is hot-deploy necessary?

2017-03-04 Thread Scott Gray
directories in 'plugins' > with a specific prefix. > Thanks > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble. > com/discussion-With-plugins-is-hot-deploy-necessary-tp4702976p4702995.html > Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: [discussion] With plugins, is hot-deploy necessary?

2017-03-04 Thread Wai
Either way is fine for me. I'll name my components directories in 'plugins' with a specific prefix. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/discussion-With-plugins-is-hot-deploy-necessary-tp4702976p4702995.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing

Re: [discussion] With plugins, is hot-deploy necessary?

2017-03-04 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
; On the other hand, Jacques Le Roux takes the position that all plugins > (open > sourced, commercial, in-house prototypes) should all be located in one > place. > > You opinions are greatly appreciated. > > Kind regards, > Wai > > > > -- > View this message in

[discussion] With plugins, is hot-deploy necessary?

2017-03-03 Thread Wai
th-plugins-is-hot-deploy-necessary-tp4702976.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.