t 5 years, Set our goals. All other open source
> >> ERP/CRM applications are doing it. There is no corporation behind
> >> ofbiz so its community's responsibility. Put a plan together. Make
> >> it easy for people to contribute. I am sure there are tons of peo
/J2EE skills set. What if Ofbiz does not remain as
>> popular 5 years down the road, How am I going to pay for my
>> daughters college expenses?
>>
>> This email is not intended to hurt anybody's feeling or scare
>> anybody. Ofbiz is in great shape, I wanted to get people to speak up
>> and help plan for future.
>>
>> Thanks and Regards
>> Anil Patel
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Application-framework-technology-set-tp195713p963334.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1, yes it would be nice to have this discussion and wider community
participation.
Thanks,
Raj
Adrian Crum wrote:
Raj Saini wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
I spent a little time looking at ServiceMix. It seems to duplicate a
lot of the OFBiz infrastructure - which may be good or bad. It has
its
+1
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 10, 2008, at 8:28 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Raj Saini wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
I spent a little time looking at ServiceMix. It seems to duplicate
a lot of the OFBiz infrastructure - whi
Raj Saini wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
I spent a little time looking at ServiceMix. It seems to duplicate a
lot of the OFBiz infrastructure - which may be good or bad. It has its
own application server container and persistence engine. Maybe we
could create our own ESB based on whatever persisten
Adrian Crum wrote:
I spent a little time looking at ServiceMix. It seems to duplicate a lot of the
OFBiz infrastructure - which may be good or bad. It has its own application
server container and persistence engine. Maybe we could create our own ESB
based on whatever persistence layer OFBiz us
--- On Fri, 10/24/08, Andrew Zeneski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When we started OFBiz in 2001, the tools available were
> less powerful and less appealing than the ones available
> today. If we were starting today I think a lot would be
> different. For example, I would probably vote for JPA over
Open For Business
Q: Do we open enough for today's large business?
It's important for OFBiz to be a component plugged into current systems
as a peripheral or a department ERP/CRM in large corporations. So OFBiz
should be able to support
1. Portal: esay to produce portlet war files that can be de
I would like to see OFBiz use Apache Directory (http://directory.apache.org)
for user permissions and security.
-Adrian
--- On Fri, 10/24/08, Anil Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Anil Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Application framework technology set
> To:
Oh btw, I bid on many jobs that cover the business gambit.
ofbiz, (with the rest of what is in the model book) covers all of them.
So ofbiz is more than ERP, it is marketing to the needs.
BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/24/2008 11:57 PM:
> I guess I am left in the dust.
> I am not up on the "J
I guess I am left in the dust.
I am not up on the "Java enterprise application development tool"
as far as JEE recommended style, ofbiz allows many presentation layers,
all that needs is the handler.
The key here was that the data could be changes in the lower levels
(entities) and there was no wor
Thanks Anil for starting this thread. I have been asking these very
questions many time while working on the OFBiz. Your POV about the
concentration on applications instead of the framework is something very
interesting. I found OFBiz community two good things about the OFBiz and
community. OFB
Anil,
These are really great questions to ask, and I am excited to see this
thread start. Let me be the first to say, I agree with you 100% that
now is the time to plan for the future.
When we started OFBiz in 2001, the tools available were less powerful
and less appealing than the ones a
Hi,
I am having little difficulty to envision, What Ofbiz will look like a
year or two down the road?
I am personally satisfied with most of core technologies of ofbiz
except for Form widget. Form widgets needs some enhancements and even
those don't seem too difficult. Ofbiz framework tech
14 matches
Mail list logo
