Screens that have dual purposes should update their titles accordingly.
-Adrian
On 12/22/2010 11:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Yes, but as BJ outlined beware of cases where the same screen is used to
create and edit!
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
I like Create New - it
don't mean to hijack the thread but on the Create new pages would like
to see the pattern used in webtools to provide all the related Create
New related to the one being created.
So something is created all the links to what else needs to be created
is shown.
=
BJ
The OFBiz UI is very inconsistent in the terminology for creating
something new - for example creating a new order, a new fixed asset, a
new party, etc. Some screens are titled New [Artifact], others are
titled Create [Artifact], and lately Edit [Artifact].
Can we agree on one term and add it
...and even Create New [Artifact] !!! :-)
My proposal is to use New [Artifact] everywhere.
I faced the same issue with the create buttons. I changed many of them
using the New [Artifact] pattern.
This is why now I suggest to use the same for the title.
Thank you,
Bruno
2010/12/22 Adrian Crum
from a UI point of view, New.
from a programing point of view Create.
I think how Edit got into it was,it assumes that there is already data,
so on the edit page is a New link.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/22/2010 11:03 AM:
=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office
I like Create New - it removes all ambiguity.
-Adrian
On 12/22/2010 12:48 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
...and even Create New [Artifact] !!! :-)
My proposal is to use New [Artifact] everywhere.
I faced the same issue with the create buttons. I changed many of them
using the New [Artifact] pattern.
Yes, but as BJ outlined beware of cases where the same screen is used to create
and edit!
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
I like Create New - it removes all ambiguity.
-Adrian
On 12/22/2010 12:48 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
...and even Create New [Artifact] !!! :-)
My proposal is
