Thanks Adam,
Very good news: the tests are now passing here using Java 7
So there is now nothing blocking us to move to Java 7 :)
Jacques
Le 25/06/2014 01:38, Adam Heath a écrit :
Fixing
On 06/24/2014 06:18 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
So move them to a separate suite, defined in testdefs/,
If I get enough responses, I'll update
macros.xml/common.xml/build.xml(s) to force the issue.
On 06/25/2014 08:48 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks Adam,
Very good news: the tests are now passing here using Java 7
So there is now nothing blocking us to move to Java 7 :)
Jacques
Le
I have a patch ready to go.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 6/25/2014 8:43 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
If I get enough responses, I'll update
macros.xml/common.xml/build.xml(s) to force the issue.
On 06/25/2014 08:48 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks Adam,
Very good
Then go!
On 06/25/2014 11:18 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I have a patch ready to go.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 6/25/2014 8:43 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
If I get enough responses, I'll update
macros.xml/common.xml/build.xml(s) to force the issue.
On 06/25/2014 08:48
So move them to a separate suite, defined in testdefs/, or ...
Since TestSuite is an extension of TestCase, have it explicitly add in
sub TestCase instances.
ps: starting up this old thread again
On 12/29/2013 01:24 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
It seems JUnit is not running the tests in the same
Fixing
On 06/24/2014 06:18 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
So move them to a separate suite, defined in testdefs/, or ...
Since TestSuite is an extension of TestCase, have it explicitly add in
sub TestCase instances.
ps: starting up this old thread again
On 12/29/2013 01:24 PM, Adrian Crum
Ok, I just fixed a bunch of these, but there were only in 2 test
suites. I was able to do a clean-all load-demo run-tests loop 10 times,
without issue.
ps: When I do this kind of work, I symlink runtime/data/derby -
/dev/shm/derby. I also keep my virtual-machine with 4 cores and 1.5G,
and
BTW noticed also this article
http://www.javacodegeeks.com/2013/05/minor-gotchas-from-migration-to-java-7.html
Jacques
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 10:16 PM jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote
Interesting, thanks Adrian!
Jacques
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 9:45 PM
It seems JUnit is not running the tests in the same sequence as before.
The tests are failing when a later test depends on the results of a
previous test.
I am still looking into this.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 12/11/2013 6:15 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
JUnit does not guarantee the tests will be run in the order that they
appear in source code:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3693626/how-to-run-test-methods-in-specific-order-in-junit4
Somehow, we got away with it. So, we need to fix our unit tests to
remove that assumption. I fixed one
Interesting, thanks Adrian!
Jacques
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 9:45 PM adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote
JUnit does not guarantee the tests will be run in the order that they
appear in source code:
Java 1.7.0_40 on OSX 10.9.1
Jacopo
On Dec 21, 2013, at 5:43 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
What was your context?
Jacques
On Friday, December 13, 2013 11:52 AM jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote
All the tests are successful in the release
Hi Jacopo,
What was your context?
Jacques
On Friday, December 13, 2013 11:52 AM jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote
All the tests are successful in the release 13.07
Jacopo
On Dec 11, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Yes here also, running
With Java 1.6.0_38-b05 the tests are running successful on my Ubuntu 12.10.
Under OpenJDK 1.7.0_25 I get 5 Failures and 2 error (errors are
testRemoveValue and testEntityCache in entitytests)
But what does the subject Moving to Java 7 mean? Just that OFBiz
should run on Java7 without problems or
It means OFBiz should run on Java 7. Since Oracle will not be updating 6
anymore, servers running on 6 might become vulnerable to attacks.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 12/16/2013 7:55 AM, Christian Geisert wrote:
With Java 1.6.0_38-b05 the tests are running
Using Ubuntu 13.10 with last Oracle Java 7 (45) in a VirtualBox on Win7, I
still get 4 failures and 1 errors
Error: a NPE on testDeposit
Failures:
testWithdraw
testForeignKeyRemove
testStoreByCondition
testRemoveByCondition
Not sure what to think...
Jacques
On Friday, December 13, 2013 5:59
All the tests are successful in the release 13.07
Jacopo
On Dec 11, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Yes here also, running
ant clean clean-data build load-demo run-tests
I got 3 errors
accountingtests
testWithdraw
testDeposit
I got 5 errors, 7 failures here on Win7 as I found on XP. I will soon install a
VM and Debian...
Jacques
On Friday, December 13, 2013 11:52 AM Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
All the tests are successful in the release 13.07
Jacopo
On Dec 11, 2013, at 12:15
The tests are not passing on Java 7. I have tried it on three different
computers. Does anyone else have that problem?
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 12/7/2013 7:33 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Support for Java 6 is fading:
http://java.com/en/download/faq/java_6.xml
Yes here also, running
ant clean clean-data build load-demo run-tests
I got 3 errors
accountingtests
testWithdraw
testDeposit
servicetests
entitytests
testSOAPSimpleService (this one fails sometimes here even with Java
6)
and 4 failures
+1
Regards,
**
Ankit Jain | 9717930151
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
+1
I am also running Java 7 in my local (dev) box without problems since a
couple of months.
I think we should migrate the trunk but also
Support for Java 6 is fading:
http://java.com/en/download/faq/java_6.xml
We need to discuss moving OFBiz over to Java 7.
I have been building and running OFBiz R13 on Oracle Java 7 for over a
month, and there were some minor compilation problems, but they were
easy to fix.
What do you
I think it's safe to move over to Java 7 without any changes.
I have run OFBiz locally - dev mode - for a long time using Java 7, until
recently where I moved back to Java 6 for other reasons.
What will be quite interesting is moving to Java 8, which IMO, we should
consider ASAP as it will be
Then much more changes can be envisionned...
Such as?
Regards
Scott
On 7/12/2013, at 1:39 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I think it's safe to move over to Java 7 without any changes.
I have run OFBiz locally - dev mode - for a long time using Java 7, until
recently where I moved back to Java
lambda functions which avoids ugly for
loops
- vm is much smaller
I think migration would be a pain though!
Taher Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:30:42 PM
Subject: Re: Discussion: Moving
...@hotwaxmedia.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:30:42 PM
Subject: Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7
Then much more changes can be envisionned...
Such as?
Regards
Scott
On 7/12/2013, at 1:39 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I think it's safe to move over to Java 7
I've also had good luck running on Java 7.
- Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
I think it's safe to move over to Java 7 without any changes.
I have run OFBiz locally - dev mode - for a long time using Java 7,
until recently where I moved back to Java 6 for other reasons.
+1
I am also running Java 7 in my local (dev) box without problems since a couple
of months.
I think we should migrate the trunk but also the 13.07 release branch because
we will issue releases until 2016.
Jacopo
On Dec 7, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
28 matches
Mail list logo
