On Feb 7, 2008, at 5:46 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
David,
thank you for your valuable feedback; please see my comments inline:
David E Jones wrote:
It sounds like Adrian's comments are a great scenario to address,
but probably only one of various that we should target.
In general with thi
David,
thank you for your valuable feedback; please see my comments inline:
David E Jones wrote:
It sounds like Adrian's comments are a great scenario to address, but
probably only one of various that we should target.
In general with this sort of thing (or designing anything really) I
rea
It sounds like Adrian's comments are a great scenario to address, but
probably only one of various that we should target.
In general with this sort of thing (or designing anything really) I
really like the idea of two goals:
1. make it as "fool-proof" as possible; fool-proof is kind of a
Adrian,
thanks for your comments:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo,
I was talking to our accountant about this the other
day. He said in a manual system, each division would
be responsible for maintaining its own GL, and the
results of those division's GLs would be posted to the
parent company's GL.
Jacopo,
I was talking to our accountant about this the other
day. He said in a manual system, each division would
be responsible for maintaining its own GL, and the
results of those division's GLs would be posted to the
parent company's GL.
In other words, the divisions would have all of the
jour
I would like to mover the up one notch.
Parent Company
Profit Center sub Corp===
Division==
what i would like to see is that the GL main as we have it, is the
Parent Company.
that the numbers in the GL
What is the best way to implement the ability to setup default GL
settings for divisions for a certain company?
For example, in the OFBiz demo data, we have the "Company" company and
some division (internal organizations, part of Company): MARKETING,
ACCOUNTING, SALES, DEV, TESTING.
After th
