Hi,
I would like to propose change in name of the following entities in
Portal. This would also result in changing the name of few keys.
PortalPortlet -- Portlet (since this is just about a portlet)
PortletPortletCategory -- PortletCategoryMember (as in
ProductCategoryMember)
IMO, they
+1
Divesh
Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose change in name of the following entities in
Portal. This would also result in changing the name of few keys.
PortalPortlet -- Portlet (since this is just about a portlet)
PortletPortletCategory -- PortletCategoryMember (as in
That is finehowever you will write also a migration program and
enter it in the
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Revisions+Requiring+Data+Migration
document how to do it?
it is worth the effort?
Regards,
Hans
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 15:58 +0530, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi,
I would like
Hi Hans,
I know very well the pain behind doing such modifications, like you
mentioned (thanks). But still I would vote for these changes, at least
this would make the current entities more logical and easy to
understand and interpret and yes it is worth the effort in IMHO.
Vikas
On Apr
+1
Nicolas
Divesh Dutta a écrit :
+1
Divesh
Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose change in name of the following entities in
Portal. This would also result in changing the name of few keys.
PortalPortlet -- Portlet (since this is just about a portlet)
PortletPortletCategory --
+1 to David's -1 :)
I totally agree with these points, to me the name change is very minor
and not worth the pain which it will cause.
Andrew
On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:39 PM, David E Jones wrote:
-1.
In fact, a big huge -1. I don't think those names make it easier to
understand but rather
On Apr 23, 2009, at 11:09 PM, David E Jones wrote:
-1.
In fact, a big huge -1. I don't think those names make it easier to
understand but rather more difficult, and then they are also not
grouped so well in the entity data maintenance and other webtools
pages, etc.
Are we so
On Apr 23, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
On Apr 23, 2009, at 11:09 PM, David E Jones wrote:
-1.
In fact, a big huge -1. I don't think those names make it easier to
understand but rather more difficult, and then they are also not
grouped so well in the entity data maintenance
