the
> jumps and what was changed since...
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Release-numbering-tp4647108p4647126.html
> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Jan 13, 2014, at 7:27 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Last year it was decided by the committers not to do annual releases
> anymore as it was too much a burden on the declining number of them.
A small but important point: there was no formal vote on this but the general
consensus was that, if no
What 'they' know and whether they can draw parrallels between is a big
thing to ask. Better to ask this in the user ML, where you will surely get
an answert. And not a person participating in this mailing list, who may
not have that indept knowledge.
Anyway, 5 years ago there might have been compe
Do you think they don't know about Ubuntu way and they can't draw a parallel
between both?
I believe OFBiz users are not only savvy but also knowledgeable
Anyway, it took me time to convince other devs about it, and I doubt they will
want to change back now, in other words, too late, sorry
Jacq
major
and minor and jumps in between begs to differ what happens in between the
jumps and what was changed since...
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Release-numbering-tp4647108p4647126.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I still prefer the Ubuntu way. It makes sense to me, it adds an information
about when the branch was freezed, w/o searching anywhere. Then we need to
number minor releases
Jacques
On Monday, January 13, 2014 1:48 PM, p...@ilscipio.com wrote
> Hey,
>
> truth to be told, i still think that the
+1 for 13.07
Jacques
On Monday, January 13, 2014 12:01 PM, jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote
> I would prefer to keep the current format because the issue is minor and to
> avoid changes in the middle of release histories; if
> we really want to switch to this then we could do only for new
ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Release-numbering-tp4647108p4647118.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I would prefer to keep the current format because the issue is minor and to
avoid changes in the middle of release histories; if we really want to switch
to this then we could do only for new branches (e.g. 13.07).
Jacopo
On Jan 13, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just
Hi,
Just got a doubt, would it not be better if we would not put a 0 ahead of the
minor release number? Not a big deal, but it could be confused with a date.
So I would have better R12.04.3 than R12.04.03, do you think it's worth the
move?
Jacques
10 matches
Mail list logo
