Thanks Jacques!
--
Rishi Solanki
Sr. Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your ideas Rishi,
>
> Fixed with
Thanks for your ideas Rishi,
Fixed with OFBIZ-9230
I had a look at checkRhsType() but that's another beast. Because AFAIK the delegator only misses when checkRhsType is called indirectly from the
JobPoller.
It begins to miss in this line in selectCountByCondition()
I dig into the issue and proposed one solution in the same Jira ticket
OFBIZ-9230. Please see if it looks fine or may be we can proceed in that
direction.
Quick Reference from ticket: "In the template/FTL context or in the screen
context whenever we get the delegator as null we can use this
All good points Michael. Replacing is neither short term nor easy as many
places in the code base depend on this feature, not to mention the need for
community approval too. I just mentioned this as an alternative solution
from a technical standpoint.
So our best bet is to fix the issue mentioned
Hi Taher,
I don't think that this is a valid short-term approach.
As far as I know, there are users and also service providers relying on
the multi-tenant feature and we should have a mid- to long-term roadmap
for a migration to other solutions.
It would be really helpful to have some
Thanks Taher,
IMO if we do that we should document clearly how to do it, before dropping and
cleaning the multi-tenancy feature.
Of course solving the 2 issues reported in OFBIZ-9230 (checkRhsType and getSystemPropertyValue) should be tried before. I'll not create Jiras for that
before we get
In my opinion, the multi-tenancy feature can be reasonably replaced with
non-java databases like mysql and postgres combined with docker. Both
instances share the same code base but with two different runtime volumes
and two databases. This would actually reduce the complexity of the code
base,
Hi,
After my analysis at https://s.apache.org/hvR9 if we don't fix the issues reported there I wonder if we don't need to remove the multitenant feature,
better not to propose a broken solution!
Jacques
