I've sometimes thought that it would be nice if all the ofbiz components ran
under some distinct top level path like "/ofbiz". Path names like "/images" and
"/content" can commonly be in use for some existing site. That would be a major
change and makes the URLs even less user friendly so I have
Runtime to me is volatile.
most files are cleared with a clean-all.
and it some cases, it just me, I clear the complete runtime.
if it is moving the demo out of the frame work then put them in the
specialpurpose in their own folder or expand the URL.properties to put
them in their respective applic
nt provider, and the OFBiz settings (see url.properties) could be updated to point to the static content provider.
-Adrian
--- On Wed, 4/21/10, Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
From: Jacopo Cappellato
Subject: What about moving the images to runtime folder?
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Wednesday
1/10, Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
> From: Jacopo Cappellato
> Subject: What about moving the images to runtime folder?
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 12:20 AM
> All the images and content that are
> loaded (or loadable) at runtime should in my opinion b
All the images and content that are loaded (or loadable) at runtime should in
my opinion be stored somewhere under the runtime folder by default
(runtime/content ?) instead of framework/images
This would also affect the demo images we are bundling with the system. Ideally
the framework, but also
