David E Jones wrote:
On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On side note I should mention that the direction has been discussed
and generally agreed on that application level properties
Hi all,
we have changed the OFBiz configuration mechanism for our latest projects
and I think this change could be useful also for the OFBiz standard.
The problem:
Our customers often have several server systems for one project, at least
a development, a test and a production server. Some of
Hi Michael,
This system exist on Neogia project with config directory. At the root
of the project, we put a site.properties that read all config files on
the site directory.
I think, we can contribut all idea to ofbiz projet, if you want ;)
Nicolas
If
Michael Brohl a écrit :
Hi all,
we
This has been discussed before and decided against.
An easier solution would be to just put all of the configuration
properties in a single file, except that:
1. different components need different configuration and we don't want
to assume in this way which components or combinations of
David E Jones wrote:
On side note I should mention that the direction has been discussed and
generally agreed on that application level properties should be done
away with (like payment.properties, and many others) and that
information should go into the database. The main reason behind that
On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On side note I should mention that the direction has been discussed
and generally agreed on that application level properties should be
done away with (like payment.properties, and many others) and that
information
On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On side note I should mention that the direction has been discussed
and generally agreed on that application level properties should be
done away with (like payment.properties, and many others) and that
information
David E Jones wrote:
On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On side note I should mention that the direction has been discussed
and generally agreed on that application level properties should be
done away with (like payment.properties, and many others) and
