On Jan 28, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 22:11 -0700, David E Jones wrote:
3. looking at the data model it appears that the Accommodation Map
structure is meant to handle the Accommodation Spot concept, ie I
don't think there is a need to distinguish those... but c
Hi David and all,
> 1. the package-name should be the same as the FixedAsset entity as
> these really describe the FixedAssets used for transportation or lodging
Yes,I agree.
> 2. while we're at it we should create entities for Scheduled
> Transportation and Scheduled Transportation Offerin
(sorry i didnt notice i sent it to the user list so i am resending it)
Hi Hans and others,
I will start from discussing Hans post and then comment and answer to
the rest of the posts (they are a lot :) ).
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:58 +0700, Hans Bakker wrote:
> 1. on the accomodation spot it is p
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To generalize this we should probably use "Lodgin" instead of "Hotel".
There are lots of kinds of lodging including hotel, motel, hostel,
campsite, condo/timeshare, etc. One the same note instead of "Hotel
Offering" we should use "Lodging Offering"
Hi David,
i am not sure if you are now making it too big...adding scheduled
transportation also needs a 'from' and a 'to' destination which are
fields which are not present on the product yetThen we need a
'regular schedule' which we have to add.
The proposal we have now does not limit t
To generalize this we should probably use "Lodgin" instead of "Hotel".
There are lots of kinds of lodging including hotel, motel, hostel,
campsite, condo/timeshare, etc. One the same note instead of "Hotel
Offering" we should use "Lodging Offering".
As for an RV/motorhome I'd say it shoul
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
4. while creating the entities we should also add corresponding seed data,
including:
Another area we should think about is camping and related (mobile home, camping caravan/recreational vehicule, etc.). I don't know
in US and in other part of the wo
NOTE: I've moved this to the dev list from the user list because this
is very clearly a discussion of enhancements to OFBiz itself.
I've been looking over these a bit, and it seems like there are a few
things outstanding with them so far, including:
1. the package-name should be the same
