Re: release life cycle

2010-03-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
s the same set of functionnalities And it's not the case for 9.04, 10.04(5?) and trunk. Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" With the focus on stability as defined by software life cycle That being that once a module had been touched, till it has had rigorous testing, it is not considered st

Re: release life cycle

2010-03-21 Thread BJ Freeman
pro> >> >> >> >> Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 3/21/2010 3:22 AM: >>> The problem with this approach is that it supposes the same set of >>> functionnalities >>> And it's not the case for 9.04, 10.04(5?) and trunk. >>> >>&

Re: release life cycle

2010-03-21 Thread Jacques Le Roux
ce a module had been touched, till it has had rigorous testing, it is not considered stable, I would like to propose a release life cycle similar to this one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle trunk would be pre-alpha 9.04 beta 10.4 would be alpha. A vote would by those di

Re: release life cycle

2010-03-21 Thread BJ Freeman
focus on stability as defined by software life cycle >> That being that once a module had been touched, till it has had >> rigorous testing, it is not considered stable, I would like to propose a >> release life cycle similar to this one. >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softw

Re: release life cycle

2010-03-21 Thread Jacques Le Roux
ill it has had rigorous testing, it is not considered stable, I would like to propose a release life cycle similar to this one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle trunk would be pre-alpha 9.04 beta 10.4 would be alpha. A vote would by those directly involve with each one. The

release life cycle

2010-03-20 Thread BJ Freeman
With the focus on stability as defined by software life cycle That being that once a module had been touched, till it has had rigorous testing, it is not considered stable, I would like to propose a release life cycle similar to this one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle