On Apr 19, 2007, at 10:57 AM, Christian Geisert wrote:
David E. Jones schrieb:
Si,
I'm not a huge fan of tags because it's so easy to note revision
numbers. Still, I agree this is a good idea to have a separate
directory
for tags and in fact, thanks for brining this up because it is
part
David E. Jones schrieb:
>
> Si,
>
> I'm not a huge fan of tags because it's so easy to note revision
> numbers. Still, I agree this is a good idea to have a separate directory
> for tags and in fact, thanks for brining this up because it is part of
> the standard ASF practices to do tags for rele
Si,
I'm not a huge fan of tags because it's so easy to note revision
numbers. Still, I agree this is a good idea to have a separate
directory for tags and in fact, thanks for brining this up because it
is part of the standard ASF practices to do tags for releases.
Let's not use the "trun
David, et. al -
I just read this: http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan I
think it looks pretty good, but I'd like to offer a couple of suggestions:
1. We should have a trunk for each release if that's not already
planned, so we'll have
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz
