Re: svn commit: r1688503 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: ./ specialpurpose/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/customer/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecomseo/WEB-INF/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/widge

Hi Pierre, I found I didn't have write access in OFBiz wiki, so I added 2 quick starts in specialpurpose/passport/README. It's in trunk rev. 1689400. Please check whether it's right if you got any chance. TIA, Shi Jinghai/Langhua 在 2015-7-6，上午3:04，Pierre Smits 写道： > HI Shi, > > Despite yo

Re: svn commit: r1688503 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: ./ specialpurpose/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/customer/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecomseo/WEB-INF/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/widge

HI Shi, Despite you considering it a minor improvement it is actually a new feature added to the set. I have tried to start locally with https://localhost:8443/passport/control/main. But that didn't work out due to a missing context in the related issue and not having any associated documents avai

Re: svn commit: r1688503 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: ./ specialpurpose/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/customer/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecomseo/WEB-INF/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/widge

Ha sorry, I just came back home. Thanks Pierre! Personally, I don't think it's a big improvement. It's only a function extension under /specialpurpose and will not be included in releases. Awfully sorry if I offended anybody. I'll write a wiki on how to config it later. Kind Regards, Shi Jin

Re: svn commit: r1688503 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: ./ specialpurpose/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/customer/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecomseo/WEB-INF/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/widge

I have personally planned to review but did not get a chance yet Jacques Le 01/07/2015 11:46, Pierre Smits a écrit : Why is this being dumped in the repository without some kind of apparent consensus about having it in? It seems to me that there was consensus regarding these kind of big improve

Re: svn commit: r1688503 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: ./ specialpurpose/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/customer/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecomseo/WEB-INF/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/widge

Were your questions not directed at the committer? I was simply making the point that the proposed changes have been available for review for quite some time. Why don't you answer the question, Scott, in stead of circumventing that by replying with another question? Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM

Re: svn commit: r1688503 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: ./ specialpurpose/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/customer/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecomseo/WEB-INF/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/widge

Why don't you answer the question, Scott, in stead of circumventing that by replying with another question? Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM * Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Thu, Jul 2, 2015

Re: svn commit: r1688503 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: ./ specialpurpose/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/customer/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecomseo/WEB-INF/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/widge

Seems like it's been in jira for a few months. When exactly were you planning on reviewing it Pierre? Why is this being dumped in the repository without some kind of apparent consensus about having it in? It seems to me that there was consensus regarding these kind of big improvements would go thr

Re: svn commit: r1688503 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/trunk: ./ specialpurpose/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/customer/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecomseo/WEB-INF/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/widge

Why is this being dumped in the repository without some kind of apparent consensus about having it in? It seems to me that there was consensus regarding these kind of big improvements would go through a process of Review Than Commit in stead of having it in trunk and then review it. Meaning having