Please explain to me how the many relationship will be presented in
the database. I was not suggesting that a contactMechId should be
present on GeoPoint, I was trying to point out that you cannot simply
change a relationship from one to many without making field changes.
Your current rela
Hi Scott,
Inline..
From: "Scott Gray"
Hi Jacques,
Have you tested this? Changing the relationship from one to many implies that there is a contactMechId on the GeoPoint entity
but that isn't the case right?
Why would we need contactMechId on GeoPoint ? The relation is established
throu
Hi Jacques,
Have you tested this? Changing the relationship from one to many
implies that there is a contactMechId on the GeoPoint entity but that
isn't the case right?
Also was it your intention that the relationship name now becomes
PointGeoPoint?
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://w
