Thanks for taking care of it Jacques.
Regards
Scott
On 6/11/2009, at 1:43 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Scott,
Sorry modelisation is the French word for design.
You are right, I have reverted in both trunk and R9.04 and also
removed the title as suggested Erwan.
I updated https://issues.ap
Hi Scott,
Sorry modelisation is the French word for design.
You are right, I have reverted in both trunk and R9.04 and also removed the
title as suggested Erwan.
I updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3153 to reflect these
changes
I want to design the fact that we may have mult
I'm sorry I don't know what modelidation means.
The elevation field doesn't allow a many relationship, it simply
creates the possibility of having one. A design flaw is not in itself
a bug unless it breaks some existing functionality which isn't the
case here. Additionally the change is b
Scott,
Actually it's a bug in the modelidation as we forgot the elevation field which allows a many relationship betwen PostalAddress and
GeoPoint (flats in building). Same for Facility as Adrian suggested.
I may revert but we will then lose this ability in R9.04
Jacques
From: "Scott Gray"
H
Hi Jacques,
I don't agree with back porting the data model change, I think
changing the relationship title is fine but changing the relationship
from one to many (which I don't think is right anyway) shouldn't be
backported unless it is addressing a bug.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http:/
