Hey Ricky,
+1, sounds fine and thanks for fixing them!
Cheers,
Chris
On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:07 PM, Nguyen, Ricky wrote:
> filed subtask OODT-431 under OODT-410.
> simple fix, didn't think i needed review board since all discussion happened
> for OODT-410 already.
> committed and seems like jenk
You rock thanks Ricky!
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:08 PM, "Nguyen, Ricky" wrote:
> filed subtask OODT-431 under OODT-410.
> simple fix, didn't think i needed review board since all discussion happened
> for OODT-410 already.
> committed and seems like jenkins build succeeds.
>
>
filed subtask OODT-431 under OODT-410.
simple fix, didn't think i needed review board since all discussion happened
for OODT-410 already.
committed and seems like jenkins build succeeds.
On Mar 22, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) wrote:
> Hey Chris,
>
> Yep, you're right so I'll look i
Hey Chris,
Yep, you're right so I'll look into this further. I know that commit broke the
build as Jenkins keeps telling the list. I wonder if the bug was there before.
If I recall you just expanded the unit test. Anyhow when I have more time I'll
try to track this down if someone doesn't get t
Hi Paul,
On Mar 21, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> This commit broke the unit test
> (org.apache.oodt.cas.filemgr.catalog.TestMappedDataSourceCatalog) with the
> addition of:
>
> assertEquals("ShouldBeFirstForPage.txt",
> ((Product)myCat.getFirstPage(type).ge
Hey Guys,
This commit broke the unit test
(org.apache.oodt.cas.filemgr.catalog.TestMappedDataSourceCatalog) with the
addition of:
assertEquals("ShouldBeFirstForPage.txt",
((Product)myCat.getFirstPage(type).getPageProducts().get(0)).getProductName());
The data source catalog is sorted by produ
